clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 13.05.2012 21:30, schrieb ingo:
> > in news:firstname.lastname@example.org H. Karsten wrote:
> > SVG would be nice to have,
[Snip some good points]
> Then again, if anyone not yet involved in POV-Ray development would be
> willing to pick up that glove, they might find themselves welcome.
If someone really wanted this, they could use XSLT to transmorgrify SVG elements
into corresponding POV-Ray objects (with some user-defined thickness)...
....Of course, "Now they have two problems."
Post a reply to this message