"MessyBlob" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Also, a question: How much change is acceptable from v3.x? If v3.x SDL code will
> be broadly incompatible due to syntax changes, then I'm wondering if it would be
> a mistake to hold onto the legacy SDL features that would make v4.x very
> difficult to implement.
.... which would be?
I don't necessary want the new SDL to look like the old one. But I think the new
one should be just as concise. Which is problematic with general-purpose
Post a reply to this message