clipka wrote:
> Chambers schrieb:
>> David H. Burns wrote:
>>> "Rad" and "deg" for angles and rotation *would* be useful.
>>
>> They're already implemented.
>>
>> // Declares the variable rad to be 45 degrees converted into radians.
>> #declare rad = radians(45);
>>
>> // Declares the variable deg to be 0.3 radians converted into degrees.
>> #declare deg = degrees(0.3);
>>
> They're perfectly counterintuitive for use in "rotate" though:
>
> // trying to express that I intend to rotate by 45 degrees,
> // with the effect of rotating by 45 radians instead
> rotate x * degrees(45)
>
> // trying to express that I intend to rotate by 0.3 radians,
> // with the effect of rotating by something particularly useless
> rotate y * radians(0.3)
True too. "Built in" unit definitions would be useful, maybe with a
default that could
be set as in calculators?
Post a reply to this message
