POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Made by Zazzle Art Server Time
24 Dec 2024 13:09:09 EST (-0500)
  Made by Zazzle Art (Message 1 to 4 of 4)  
From: gregjohn
Subject: Made by Zazzle Art
Date: 31 Jan 2015 09:50:00
Message: <web.54cceaf4ff4aa543d44a22e40@news.povray.org>
I recognize this as povray. If the code were released as creative commons, I
applaud both originator and seller. But is this appropriate use of the work?

http://www.zazzle.com/dissolution_print-228184578769283321


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Made by Zazzle Art
Date: 31 Jan 2015 10:40:30
Message: <54ccf76e$1@news.povray.org>
On 31/01/2015 14:47, gregjohn wrote:
> I recognize this as povray. If the code were released as creative commons, I
> applaud both originator and seller. But is this appropriate use of the work?
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/dissolution_print-228184578769283321
>

I think that it has been uploaded by the creator, Newt.
Nothing wrong with that, Greg. Is there?
Or am I missing something?

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: gregjohn
Subject: Re: Made by Zazzle Art
Date: 31 Jan 2015 18:25:00
Message: <web.54cd63cb1830b9e0d44a22e40@news.povray.org>
Hmm, okay, sorry for false alarm.  The whole "Made by Zazzle" thing made me leap
to conclusions.

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 31/01/2015 14:47, gregjohn wrote:
> > I recognize this as povray. If the code were released as creative commons, I
> > applaud both originator and seller. But is this appropriate use of the work?
> >
> > http://www.zazzle.com/dissolution_print-228184578769283321
> >
>
> I think that it has been uploaded by the creator, Newt.
> Nothing wrong with that, Greg. Is there?
> Or am I missing something?
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Made by Zazzle Art
Date: 31 Jan 2015 23:52:05
Message: <54cdb0f5$1@news.povray.org>
On 31/01/2015 23:22, gregjohn wrote:
> Hmm, okay, sorry for false alarm.  The whole "Made by Zazzle" thing made me leap
> to conclusions.
>

That and him calling himself Newtzazzle doesn't help.
I had to expend a few brain cells, there. ^_^

> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 31/01/2015 14:47, gregjohn wrote:
>>> I recognize this as povray. If the code were released as creative commons, I
>>> applaud both originator and seller. But is this appropriate use of the work?
>>>
>>> http://www.zazzle.com/dissolution_print-228184578769283321
>>>
>>
>> I think that it has been uploaded by the creator, Newt.
>> Nothing wrong with that, Greg. Is there?
>> Or am I missing something?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>       Stephen
>
>


-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.