Played with onion-pattern, couldn't resist...

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'onion.png' (712 KB)

Preview of image 'onion.png'

On 19/01/2015 20:12, H. Karsten wrote:
> Played with onion-pattern, couldn't resist...
>

I don't know what to say other than I like it. Very much.
A description of how it was made would be appreciated. :-)


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 19/01/2015 20:12, H. Karsten wrote:
> > Played with onion-pattern, couldn't resist...
> >
>
> I don't know what to say other than I like it. Very much.
> A description of how it was made would be appreciated. :-)
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

We used a rope. The lower left corner of the door was <0,0,0> and the radius was
1.5m. We used a pencil first and filled the areas with the color later on.

rgds, Holger :)

Post a reply to this message

"H. Karsten" <h-karsten()web.de> wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> > On 19/01/2015 20:12, H. Karsten wrote:
> > > Played with onion-pattern, couldn't resist...
> > >
> >
> > I don't know what to say other than I like it. Very much.
> > A description of how it was made would be appreciated. :-)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards
> >      Stephen
>
> We used a rope. The lower left corner of the door was <0,0,0> and the radius was
> 1.5m. We used a pencil first and filled the areas with the color later on.
>
> rgds, Holger :)

Ah! The old fashioned way.
It worked well with the dogs. ;-)

Post a reply to this message

> We used a rope. The lower left corner of the door was<0,0,0>  and the radius was
> 1.5m. We used a pencil first and filled the areas with the color later on.

How does the render time compare to POV-Ray?

Post a reply to this message

>> We used a rope. The lower left corner of the door was<0,0,0>  and the
>> radius was
>> 1.5m. We used a pencil first and filled the areas with the color later
>> on.
>
> How does the render time compare to POV-Ray?

With this many photons and radiosity, his technique is much, much better.

-- 
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/*   gmail.com     */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }

Post a reply to this message

>> How does the render time compare to POV-Ray?
>
> With this many photons and radiosity, his technique is much, much better.

And after you've rendered it once you can view it from any angle instantly!

Post a reply to this message

>>> How does the render time compare to POV-Ray?
>>
>> With this many photons and radiosity, his technique is much, much better.
>
> And after you've rendered it once you can view it from any angle instantly!

And it has the best particle system ever...

Post a reply to this message