|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello. I'm interested in inserting a certain operation into GIMP (resize to X
pixels). I'm sure I could figure out the way to achieve this functionality if
I knew GIMP's terminology for such.
Can someone educate me on what GIMP calls this kind of thing, if it were to have
it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: nemesis
Subject: Re: GIMP hotkeys/ scripts/ user-defined functions?
Date: 9 Dec 2008 16:20:05
Message: <493ee105@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
gregjohn escreveu:
> Hello. I'm interested in inserting a certain operation into GIMP (resize to X
> pixels). I'm sure I could figure out the way to achieve this functionality if
> I knew GIMP's terminology for such.
>
> Can someone educate me on what GIMP calls this kind of thing, if it were to have
> it?
You can try Filters -> Script-Fu -> Console. I think all of Gimp's API
is available in this way. It has a very handy procedure browser, with
documentation and a search box. For instance, searching for resi
already gives 2 functions for image resizing and 2 for layer resizing.
It's Gimp's default scripting language, a TinyScheme interpreter. Don't
feel terrified, Scheme is a very easy language and in any case you'll
be using it just to call functions. Syntax is simple: (function-name
par1 par2 par3 ...). That's it, the name of the function is the first
thing in the procedure call and it comes inside the parentheses.
Hope that helps.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mueen Nawaz
Subject: Re: GIMP hotkeys/ scripts/ user-defined functions?
Date: 9 Dec 2008 19:04:35
Message: <493f0793$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> It's Gimp's default scripting language, a TinyScheme interpreter. Don't
> feel terrified, Scheme is a very easy language and in any case you'll
> be using it just to call functions. Syntax is simple: (function-name
> par1 par2 par3 ...). That's it, the name of the function is the first
> thing in the procedure call and it comes inside the parentheses.
Also, Gimp has supported scripting via Python for a long time now, and
I heard that they consider it the official scripting language now.
--
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>> It's Gimp's default scripting language, a TinyScheme interpreter. Don't
>> feel terrified, Scheme is a very easy language and in any case you'll
>> be using it just to call functions. Syntax is simple: (function-name
>> par1 par2 par3 ...). That's it, the name of the function is the first
>> thing in the procedure call and it comes inside the parentheses.
>
> Also, Gimp has supported scripting via Python for a long time now, and
> I heard that they consider it the official scripting language now.
It's truly irrelevant the choice of language when all you really do is
just call procedures.
But anyway, Script-Fu is TinyScript and comes builtin with Gimp because
it's a really small and lightweight interpreter. I didn't see any
Python-Fu in the Win build, though it's here in my Ubuntu Gimp.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: GIMP hotkeys/ scripts/ user-defined functions?
Date: 10 Dec 2008 08:32:19
Message: <493fc4e3@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> But anyway, Script-Fu is TinyScript and comes builtin with Gimp because
> it's a really small and lightweight interpreter. I didn't see any
> Python-Fu in the Win build, though it's here in my Ubuntu Gimp.
Didn't Gimp use some form of Lisp at some point? I remember it being a
PITA to write a simple macro...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>
>> But anyway, Script-Fu is TinyScript and comes builtin with Gimp
>> because it's a really small and lightweight interpreter. I didn't see
>> any Python-Fu in the Win build, though it's here in my Ubuntu Gimp.
>
> Didn't Gimp use some form of Lisp at some point? I remember it being a
> PITA to write a simple macro...
Sorry, I wrote it wrong the second time: it's TinyScheme, not TinyScript.
Yes, Scheme is a Lisp dialect. No, I quite don't understand why it'd be
such a PITA. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: GIMP hotkeys/ scripts/ user-defined functions?
Date: 10 Dec 2008 09:50:30
Message: <493fd736$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> Yes, Scheme is a Lisp dialect. No, I quite don't understand why it'd be
> such a PITA. :)
Something about dozens of parenthesis...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: GIMP hotkeys/ scripts/ user-defined functions?
Date: 10 Dec 2008 10:02:38
Message: <493fda0e$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yes, Scheme is a Lisp dialect. No, I quite don't understand why it'd
>> be such a PITA. :)
>
> Something about dozens of parenthesis...
(if (= 1 x) (lambda (n) (1)) (lambda (n) (+ 1 n)))
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: nemesis
Subject: Re: GIMP hotkeys/ scripts/ user-defined functions?
Date: 10 Dec 2008 10:18:44
Message: <493fddd4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>
>> Yes, Scheme is a Lisp dialect. No, I quite don't understand why it'd
>> be such a PITA. :)
>
> Something about dozens of parenthesis...
Most of it are procedure calls and would need parentheses in most
languages anyway. At least, no colons between parameters are needed. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible escreveu:
>>> Yes, Scheme is a Lisp dialect. No, I quite don't understand why it'd
>>> be such a PITA. :)
>>
>> Something about dozens of parenthesis...
>
> (if (= 1 x) (lambda (n) (1)) (lambda (n) (+ 1 n)))
I don't really think someone scripting Gimp needs lambdas. And your
first lambda will fail because 1 is not a function, but you've put it in
calling context as the first element of a list.
Other than that, "if" is as straightforward as in any language.
(if condition
this
that)
or just
(if condition this)
Actually, the "if-then-else" statement was born in Lisp.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |