 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> (Of course, what I forgot is that you have to know what something looks
> like before you can draw it. DOH!)
You definitely need more college art classes.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> (Of course, what I forgot is that you have to know what something
>> looks like before you can draw it. DOH!)
>
> You definitely need more college art classes.
Uh... why?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> I'd make some belittling remark here - but then I basically started
> learning to draw so I could draw naked girls. I guess that makes me just
> as pathetic. :-S
> (Of course, what I forgot is that you have to know what something looks
> like before you can draw it. DOH!)
Remember what the internet is for...
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> (Of course, what I forgot is that you have to know what something looks
>> like before you can draw it. DOH!)
>
> Remember what the internet is for...
Heh. I meant *real* girls. :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> (Of course, what I forgot is that you have to know what something
>>> looks like before you can draw it. DOH!)
>>
>> You definitely need more college art classes.
>
> Uh... why?
Where do you think people go to learn to draw nudes? How do you think
they get taught?
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Remember what the internet is for...
Now *that* made me laugh. Thank you.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"B. Gimeno" <bgi### [at] lycoses> wrote:
> While surfing on the excellent forum for professionals CGSociety.org I came
> across this excellent image. (Note to sensitive and morally offended, this link
> contains an artistic nude).
Now, what kind of sick mind would be offended by an image of a pretty girl?
> http://oddity.cgsociety.org/gallery/655126/
The face somehow looks childlike in a way that looks mismatched to her body.
(But as a latent artist who's been unsuccessful with portraits, I still
struggle with how head and facial features convey age, sex, and other
characteristics.)
The hair and the skin texture are spectacular. The anatomical forms and the
skin textures of the elbow and feet show a remarkable attention to detail, as
well as how her thigh is deformed by the way she sits on the chair.
And refreshingly, the model is shaped like a real woman and not like a Barbie
doll.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> Darren New wrote:
>>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>> (Of course, what I forgot is that you have to know what something
>>>> looks like before you can draw it. DOH!)
>>>
>>> You definitely need more college art classes.
>>
>> Uh... why?
>
> Where do you think people go to learn to draw nudes? How do you think
> they get taught?
Heh. I thought they only draw ugly guys? :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Photorrealism (Portrait of a Girl)
Date: 11 Nov 2008 17:00:37
Message: <491a0084@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Cousin Ricky wrote:
> "gregjohn" <pte### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>> Okay, I'll be a malignant troll and comment on the image. What's the
>> point? As
>> one post said in the thread, why not just bring along a camera? I think
>> that with too much attempts at realism in CG, you're either in the
>> Uncanny Valley, or you're so realistic it raises the question of why
>> don't you use photograph a model.
>
> You can get naked CG models to do things that naked actors refuse to do in
> real life. ;-)
Ever heard of "Poser porn"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Ever heard of "Poser porn"?
I do recall the bunch of lads in the tech support office of one place
had a bit Lara Croft pinup on the wall.
I'm sitting there thinking to myself "um, you guys know that you're
staring at a large polygon mesh, right? I mean, this object doesn't even
*exist* in the usual sense of the word! Even fantasising over an
unattainable supermodel seems better than lusting for a non-existent
fictional character...!"
Given that these guys still thought it was hilarious to say "arse!"
every now and then, I guess that thought would be lost on them...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
