 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen escreveu:
> Darren New wrote:
>> nemesis wrote:
>>> And my point is that it's irrelevant and superfluous.
>> Well, unless you want to use youtube or google chat.
>>
>
> Youtube can be used via downloaders. It's not as practical, but possible.
>
> Flash, in the form it exists right now, should be banned from this
> world. It's a nice idea, but pretty much screwed up as a system.
OTOH, better Flash than Silverlight, huh Darren? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> And my point is that it's irrelevant and superfluous.
>
> Well, unless you want to use youtube or google chat.
I don't mind idiotube and GoogleChat is in javascript AFAIK.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > nemesis wrote:
> >> And my point is that it's irrelevant and superfluous.
> >
> > Well, unless you want to use youtube or google chat.
> >
> Youtube can be used via downloaders. It's not as practical, but possible.
> Flash, in the form it exists right now, should be banned from this
> world. It's a nice idea, but pretty much screwed up as a system.
I think you are letting your aversion take over rational judgement
because you can't concede even one single positive thing about Flash
(ie. that it makes services like YouTube really practical).
Well, if you don't want to use Flash, that's your loss.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> OTOH, better Flash than Silverlight, huh Darren? ;)
Dunno. I never really looked into the innards of either.
MS *does* tend to improve what they copy. :-) I'd expect Silverlight to
be better in many ways than Flash, just because MS got to see all the
things Flash did wrong.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> nemesis wrote:
>>> And my point is that it's irrelevant and superfluous.
>> Well, unless you want to use youtube or google chat.
>>
>
> Youtube can be used via downloaders. It's not as practical, but possible.
>
> Flash, in the form it exists right now, should be banned from this
> world. It's a nice idea, but pretty much screwed up as a system.
>
I would almost agree, but I've seen more of what Flash is capable of.
I'll stick to just banning it from simple menus, and repeating movie
clips for advertisements. For 2.5D, and 3D, interactive spaces it's
actually pretty useful.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>> And my point is that it's irrelevant and superfluous.
>
> Well, unless you want to use youtube or google chat.
>
google chat? Since when that uses Flash?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>
> Youtube can be used via downloaders. It's not as practical, but possible.
>
.... which is the "live in a mud hut, wipe with a leaf" option. And again, how
many distros (I know many won't play MPEG-I's off the bat) will play whatever
you have bothered to download?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Youtube can be used via downloaders. It's not as practical, but possible.
Many other sites that deliver video can't. Ever tried Hulu?
> Flash, in the form it exists right now, should be banned from this
> world. It's a nice idea, but pretty much screwed up as a system.
Flash may have its negative points, but you provide no alternative, nor
make a case that alternatives are not needed.
As it stands, it's much better than its predecessor (Java applets).
--
Maths and alcohol don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>> And my point is that it's irrelevant and superfluous.
>
> Well, unless you want to use youtube or google chat.
>
Its also used by "several" free internet TV systems, which is a pain in
the ass, because Second Life doesn't support either embedded mms, (Uses
MediaPlayer), or the latest version of Flash. Wish it did. I would love
to set of a theater that actually "showed" shows, instead of looking
like it did, even if it was ancient ones. lol
--
void main () {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> google chat? Since when that uses Flash?
I don't know, but my laptop has two accounts, one of which flas works
and one where flash doesn't. The account where flash doesn't work won't
do the gtalk web thingie either. It might not be related to flash, tho.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
