 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:39:41 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> LOL, I wonder how many recognize the song....
>>
>> And where from...
>
> Out of curiosity... what *is* it?
It's a variation of "You'll Never Walk Alone", from the Rogers &
Hammerstein musical "Carousel".
Where I recognized it from, though, is H2G2.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:52:04 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>>>> I LOLd. IRL!
>>> You weren't alone. ;-)
>> Read on, read on,
>> With POV on your screen
>> And you'll neeeeeeveeeeeerrrr LOOOOOOL aloooooone! You'll
>> neeeeeeeeeeeeeeveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrr LOL alone!
>
> LOL, I wonder how many recognize the song....
>
> And where from...
>
> Jim
Rogers & Hammerstein, State Fair?
--
----
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Alan Shore was advised to "kick ass" by Deny (Captain Kirk).
I don't know who Alan Shore or "Deny" is.
> Walks in and puts the Supreme Court in their unconscionable, pro-business,
> "protector of government", places.
This sentence has no subject and hence is meaningless.
> "At least have the decency to put your name on a ballot so we get a say in
> the
> matter"
I don't know what this quote is referring to or who said it.
> Plaintiff says " unconscionable" and "unspeakable" and Deny farts.
This is a complete sentence but it has no context.
> Hope you didn't miss it. Check the DVR.
I understand these two sentences.
I don't mean to be rude, especially if English isn't your first language,
but your posts are only very marginally more decipherable than the spam I
recieve that is made up of random pieces of text pulled off the internet.
You need to put a lot more effort into clarity if you want anyone to know
what you're talking about, let alone what you're trying to say about it.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
alphaQuad wrote:
> Alan Shore was advised to "kick ass" by Deny (Captain Kirk).
>
> Walks in and puts the Supreme Court in their unconscionable, pro-business,
> "protector of government", places.
If the Supreme Court were pro-business, the annual US cost of business
regulation would be far less than the 800 gigabucks it currently is
estimated to be.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I now understand completely Alan Shore's reaction of dread and stress upon
realizing he had a Supreme Court case. It meant that he was going to get
extremely outraged considering what the Supreme Court is now and has done. And
consensus to understand and listen. Like talking to a rock.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:27:07 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> > Mike Raiford wrote:
> >
> >> Wow, seriously; that made no sense. Get back on your meds.
> >
> > I LOLd. IRL!
>
> You weren't alone. ;-)
>
> Jim
Yes the lack of concern for someone that may actually need meds is quite clear.
You people are the sick ones and need the meds to wake your sleeping souls.
Jim? Still taking those flourides? Or was that someone in your family monkey
tree, you hypocrite.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
alphaQuad wrote:
> Jim? Still taking those flourides? Or was that someone in your family monkey
> tree, you hypocrite.
I brush with fluoride toothpaste, does that count? What about
fluoridated tap water. oooh... biiig government conspiracy there.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
alphaQuad wrote:
>
> Yes the lack of concern for someone that may actually need meds is quite clear.
>
> You people are the sick ones and need the meds to wake your sleeping souls.
>
> Jim? Still taking those flourides? Or was that someone in your family monkey
> tree, you hypocrite.
>
>
I think you'd get a kick out of reading about MKULTRA and Monarch. I
stopped reading when they accused the Catholic Church of being satanist,
though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:13:32 -0400, alphaQuad wrote:
> Jim? Still taking those flourides? Or was that someone in your family
> monkey tree, you hypocrite.
That was uncalled for - a personal attack. How nice.
Plonked.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> alphaQuad wrote:
>
> > Jim? Still taking those flourides? Or was that someone in your family monkey
> > tree, you hypocrite.
>
> I brush with fluoride toothpaste, does that count? What about
> fluoridated tap water. oooh... biiig government conspiracy there.
Hi Mike,
It is interesting that Teflon is a carbon-fluorine chain.
With the highest electro negativity of all atoms, toothpaste fluoride bonds to
the tooth enamel making it harder. And should remain there and not be a
problem.
But to say we need to add it to the water is insanity because you are now
putting fluoride into the blood stream to damage CNS Meninges. If you read the
fluoride pathology you will see excitability as a symptom of fluoride
poisoning. The conspiracy is to promote violence by the addition of fluoride.
Ever see that ignorant commercial, "this is your brain" (an egg) "this is your
brain on drugs" (into the frying pan), of course you have. They were actually
quite correct when comes to sulfides and fluorides. They wanted you to think
Mother Nature is poison. 100% conspiracy.
Mother Nature cannot be had except on the street at the price of gold. It is
legal to torture you and steal your REAL meds? No conspiracy there? Does the
sun come up in the daylight?
Its good to see an honest question instead of republican, death-inflicting,
discrediting agendas. Or making a joke out the fact that someone might be sick.
How sick is that.
aQ
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
