 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:36:31 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> I should feel guilty, I think.
Nah, you shouldn't, unless you have specific reason to.
--
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/9/2017 10:24 PM, dick balaska wrote:
> Am 2017-05-09 16:36, also sprach Stephen:
>> I should feel guilty, I think.
>
> I demand restitution! I have been moderately inconvenienced!
>
Nah! That's a political thing.
I'm sure you mean reconstitution. :) <-- Smiley
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/9/2017 11:49 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:36:31 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> I should feel guilty, I think.
>
> Nah, you shouldn't, unless you have specific reason to.
>
>
>
I feel I'm missing out.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-5-2017 16:58, clipka wrote:
> Am 08.05.2017 um 16:09 schrieb Bald Eagle:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
>>
>>>> "... However, due to the gradually increasing luminosity of the Sun, the oceans
>>>> of the Earth will have vaporized long before that time (about 2,100 million
>>>> years from now)."
>>>>
>>>> Hmmmm....
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You weren't planning to be around for it, were you? :)
>>
>>
>> I was just observing that there definitely seems to be SOMETHING that will warm
>> our planet.... What _could_ it be...?
>>
>> It certainly can't be that ridiculously huge thermonuclear furnace that's
>> 1,300,000 times the size of the Earth, that's for sure.
>>
>> Must be something _we_ did. :|
>
> Yeah, that unprecedented sudden temperature increase over the last 100
> years or so, that's _totally_ just the sun.
>
> (facepalm)
>
> You do know that, say, 1000 years ago the sun had already been around,
> and in pretty much its current form, right?
>
I don't buy that. Given the rate of combustion, the sun cannot be more
than a couple of centuries old. I got secret information telling me that
the mysterious NASA space craft that landed a couple of days ago has
something to do with the kindling of a new sun...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/10/2017 7:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 8-5-2017 16:58, clipka wrote:
>>
>> You do know that, say, 1000 years ago the sun had already been around,
>> and in pretty much its current form, right?
>>
>
> I don't buy that. Given the rate of combustion, the sun cannot be more
> than a couple of centuries old. I got secret information telling me that
> the mysterious NASA space craft that landed a couple of days ago has
> something to do with the kindling of a new sun...
>
Fair point.
Isn't that what kings and queens are for, to make the gods do their job?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-5-2017 8:56, Stephen wrote:
> On 5/10/2017 7:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 8-5-2017 16:58, clipka wrote:
>
>>>
>>> You do know that, say, 1000 years ago the sun had already been around,
>>> and in pretty much its current form, right?
>>>
>>
>> I don't buy that. Given the rate of combustion, the sun cannot be more
>> than a couple of centuries old. I got secret information telling me that
>> the mysterious NASA space craft that landed a couple of days ago has
>> something to do with the kindling of a new sun...
>>
>
> Fair point.
> Isn't that what kings and queens are for, to make the gods do their job?
>
>
Exactly. Not enough kings and queens in this world. Climate change
started when the populace killed them or exiled them.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/10/2017 8:09 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 10-5-2017 8:56, Stephen wrote:
>> On 5/10/2017 7:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 8-5-2017 16:58, clipka wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> You do know that, say, 1000 years ago the sun had already been around,
>>>> and in pretty much its current form, right?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't buy that. Given the rate of combustion, the sun cannot be more
>>> than a couple of centuries old. I got secret information telling me that
>>> the mysterious NASA space craft that landed a couple of days ago has
>>> something to do with the kindling of a new sun...
>>>
>>
>> Fair point.
>> Isn't that what kings and queens are for, to make the gods do their job?
>>
>>
>
> Exactly. Not enough kings and queens in this world. Climate change
> started when the populace killed them or exiled them.
>
The timing is right. If you look at the curve.
You are beginning to convince me.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-5-2017 9:19, Stephen wrote:
> On 5/10/2017 8:09 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 10-5-2017 8:56, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 5/10/2017 7:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>> On 8-5-2017 16:58, clipka wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You do know that, say, 1000 years ago the sun had already been around,
>>>>> and in pretty much its current form, right?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't buy that. Given the rate of combustion, the sun cannot be more
>>>> than a couple of centuries old. I got secret information telling me
>>>> that
>>>> the mysterious NASA space craft that landed a couple of days ago has
>>>> something to do with the kindling of a new sun...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fair point.
>>> Isn't that what kings and queens are for, to make the gods do their job?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Exactly. Not enough kings and queens in this world. Climate change
>> started when the populace killed them or exiled them.
>>
>
>
> The timing is right. If you look at the curve.
> You are beginning to convince me.
>
I have never spoken out publicly before for fear of retaliation but
patriotism and true love for my queen and king has convinced me to start
this crusade.
[takes stance, watching the far horizon]
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-5-2017 0:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:36:31 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> I should feel guilty, I think.
>
> Nah, you shouldn't, unless you have specific reason to.
>
>
>
I suspect Stephen leaked oil from the pipes to cook his haddocks... :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/10/2017 8:33 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 10-5-2017 9:19, Stephen wrote:
>> On 5/10/2017 8:09 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 10-5-2017 8:56, Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 5/10/2017 7:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>> On 8-5-2017 16:58, clipka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do know that, say, 1000 years ago the sun had already been
>>>>>> around,
>>>>>> and in pretty much its current form, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't buy that. Given the rate of combustion, the sun cannot be more
>>>>> than a couple of centuries old. I got secret information telling me
>>>>> that
>>>>> the mysterious NASA space craft that landed a couple of days ago has
>>>>> something to do with the kindling of a new sun...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fair point.
>>>> Isn't that what kings and queens are for, to make the gods do their
>>>> job?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Exactly. Not enough kings and queens in this world. Climate change
>>> started when the populace killed them or exiled them.
>>>
>>
>>
>> The timing is right. If you look at the curve.
>> You are beginning to convince me.
>>
>
> I have never spoken out publicly before for fear of retaliation but
> patriotism and true love for my queen and king has convinced me to start
> this crusade.
>
It is cold. The wind blows from the North East.
And the mouse eats the uncovered corn in the yard. ;-)
> [takes stance, watching the far horizon]
>
>
[takes stance, watching the other horizon]
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
