 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 01/02/2016 09:37 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>> Oh, right. I just wrote 20 pages about a camera, and didn't post any
>> pictures...
>
> Take one ordinary box of chocolates. Shoot sideways with the widest
> aperture the lens can manage. PROFIT!
Nice isosurfaces. crackle texture?
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Orchid Win7 v1: Nikon
> Scott: Canon
Begun, the camera wars have.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/2/2016 1:19 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
> >> Orchid Win7 v1: Nikon
>> Scott: Canon
>
> Begun, the camera wars have.
>
If it is not a pinhole it is not true to the spirit and is a softboy's
cheat. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/2/2016 2:46 AM, Mike Horvath wrote:
>
> Careful. That sounds kind of like socialism. Who are you to infringe
> upon the camera makers' right to differentiate.
Tee Hee
A dope smoking red under the bed. ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 02.02.2016 um 14:15 schrieb Francois Labreque:
>> On 1-2-2016 23:42, Mike Horvath wrote:
>>> On 2/1/2016 4:40 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>>> On 01/02/2016 09:37 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>>>> Oh, right. I just wrote 20 pages about a camera, and didn't post any
>>>>> pictures...
>>>>
>>>> Take one ordinary box of chocolates. Shoot sideways with the widest
>>>> aperture the lens can manage. PROFIT!
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, and hashish filled chocolates I presume.
>>
>> I think he is fooling us. Those are POV-Ray renders, not photographs.
>>
> It's a twist on the RSOCP. The RSs are embedded in the CP.
Well, the chocolates may contain VSOP...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 02.02.2016 um 14:39 schrieb Stephen:
> On 2/2/2016 1:19 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
>> >> Orchid Win7 v1: Nikon
>>> Scott: Canon
>>
>> Begun, the camera wars have.
>>
>
> If it is not a pinhole it is not true to the spirit and is a softboy's
> cheat. :)
Is that why smartphones have such small lenses? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/2/2016 2:24 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 02.02.2016 um 14:39 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 2/2/2016 1:19 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
>>> >> Orchid Win7 v1: Nikon
>>>> Scott: Canon
>>>
>>> Begun, the camera wars have.
>>>
>>
>> If it is not a pinhole it is not true to the spirit and is a softboy's
>> cheat. :)
>
> Is that why smartphones have such small lenses? ;)
>
I don't know. Why do smartphones have such small lenses?
;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/02/2016 08:32 AM, scott wrote:
>> So I went back and tried to redo the shot at ISO 100. Aaaand captured a
>> whole load of camera shake, and not much else.
>>
>> I see there's a 40mm f/1.8 lens that's cheap...
>>
>> OH GOD, IT HAS STARTED! O_O
>
> :-)
>
> Get a tripod, invaluable for shots like this.
I've already got a tripod. It's not especially good though. And
regardless, you can't use a tripod to hold the camera half an inch away
from a horizontal surface, while facing at a jaunty angle. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/02/2016 01:19 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
> >> Orchid Win7 v1: Nikon
>> Scott: Canon
>
> Begun, the camera wars have.
Yeah, everybody I speak to seems to think that Canon is the only
acceptable brand.
I have no idea why.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/2/2016 6:17 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 08:32 AM, scott wrote:
>>> So I went back and tried to redo the shot at ISO 100. Aaaand captured a
>>> whole load of camera shake, and not much else.
>>>
>>> I see there's a 40mm f/1.8 lens that's cheap...
>>>
>>> OH GOD, IT HAS STARTED! O_O
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Get a tripod, invaluable for shots like this.
>
> I've already got a tripod. It's not especially good though. And
> regardless, you can't use a tripod to hold the camera half an inch away
> from a horizontal surface, while facing at a jaunty angle. :-P
Think about a monopod.
They are more stable for handhelds than not having one.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
