From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: If the universe was a programming language...
Date: 3 Oct 2015 05:05:56
Message: <560f9a74$1@news.povray.org>
On 02/10/2015 10:10 PM, clipka wrote:
> ... then it would be Haskell. Because apparently it uses lazy evaluation.
Well, it would certainly explain the whole "doesn't exist until you
observe it" thing...
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> ... then it would be Haskell. Because apparently it uses lazy evaluation.
but does it sound as good as a Lisp organ? don't think so...
From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: If the universe was a programming language...
Date: 6 Oct 2015 01:35:06
Message: <56135d8a$1@news.povray.org>
Le 05/10/2015 14:38, nemesis a écrit :
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:>> ... then it would be Haskell. Because apparently it uses lazy evaluation.>> but does it sound as good as a Lisp organ? don't think so...>
The universe might be in haskell, but eukariote organisms are in lisp:
what else than membrane would be all theses parentheses ?
Looking carefully, their replication are also like the handling of trees
and sequences in lisp.
From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: If the universe was a programming language...
Date: 6 Oct 2015 06:15:16
Message: <56139f34$1@news.povray.org>
On 06/10/2015 06:35 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> The universe might be in haskell, but eukariote organisms are in lisp:> what else than membrane would be all theses parentheses ?
Maybe it's Liskell?
https://github.com/haskell-lisp/liskell/blob/master/LskPrelude/LskPrelude.lsk
org> wrote: