 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Has your email address changed?
Just got this:
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
> mac### [at] aol com
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the
recipient domain aol.com by mailin-03.mx.aol.com. [64.12.91.196].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 5.1.1 <mac### [at] aolcom>: Recipient address rejected: aol.com
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/02/2015 15:06, Doctor John wrote:
> Has your email address changed?
>
> Just got this:
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>
>> mac### [at] aolcom
>>
>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the
recipient domain aol.com by mailin-03.mx.aol.com. [64.12.91.196].
>>
>> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 550 5.1.1 <mac### [at] aolcom>: Recipient address rejected: aol.com
>
> John
>
Just got this:
I've been spending the weekend migrating everything from my old 32 bit
machines to newer 64 bit ones.
Don't you just love technology?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/02/15 15:35, Stephen wrote:
> Just got this:
>
> I've been spending the weekend migrating everything from my old 32 bit
> machines to newer 64 bit ones.
>
> Don't you just love technology?
>
I re-sent the mail after deciding that aol.com had buggered up their
end. Everyone else that I emailed got them with no probs.
I blame Cameron, Milliband, Clegg et al. :-)
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/02/2015 15:48, Doctor John wrote:
> I re-sent the mail after deciding that aol.com had buggered up their
> end. Everyone else that I emailed got them with no probs.
>
Maybe it bounced off one of the scores of "blue pill" emails I'm getting.
> I blame Cameron, Milliband, Clegg et al.:-)
Too true. Even if they didn't, Guido Fawkes had the right idea.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/02/15 17:02, Stephen wrote:
>
> Too true. Even if they didn't, Guido Fawkes had the right idea.
>
Indeed. The only man to enter parliament with the intention of doing
something constructive :-)
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/02/2015 18:26, Doctor John wrote:
> On 01/02/15 17:02, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> Too true. Even if they didn't, Guido Fawkes had the right idea.
>>
>
> Indeed. The only man to enter parliament with the intention of doing
> something constructive :-)
>
I have a soft spot for The Beast of Bolsover, as well.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-2-2015 19:31, Stephen wrote:
> On 01/02/2015 18:26, Doctor John wrote:
>> On 01/02/15 17:02, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>> Too true. Even if they didn't, Guido Fawkes had the right idea.
>>>
>>
>> Indeed. The only man to enter parliament with the intention of doing
>> something constructive :-)
>>
>
> I have a soft spot for The Beast of Bolsover, as well.
>
>
That sounds like a Gothic novel... ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/02/2015 08:10, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 1-2-2015 19:31, Stephen wrote:
>> On 01/02/2015 18:26, Doctor John wrote:
>>> On 01/02/15 17:02, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Too true. Even if they didn't, Guido Fawkes had the right idea.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed. The only man to enter parliament with the intention of doing
>>> something constructive :-)
>>>
>>
>> I have a soft spot for The Beast of Bolsover, as well.
>>
>>
> That sounds like a Gothic novel... ;-)
>
It is a good nickname. And he does work in a Gothic palace.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/02/15 09:09, Stephen wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 08:10, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 1-2-2015 19:31, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 01/02/2015 18:26, Doctor John wrote:
>>>> On 01/02/15 17:02, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Too true. Even if they didn't, Guido Fawkes had the right idea.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. The only man to enter parliament with the intention of doing
>>>> something constructive :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have a soft spot for The Beast of Bolsover, as well.
>>>
>>>
>> That sounds like a Gothic novel... ;-)
>>
>
> It is a good nickname. And he does work in a Gothic palace.
>
... and for those who don't follow British politics closely:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Skinner
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/02/15 18:31, Stephen wrote:
>
> I have a soft spot for The Beast of Bolsover, as well.
>
>
I have to second that. Despite his politics being way to the left of
mine, I have to admire him; he has that rarest of virtues to be found in
a politician, he has absolute integrity. Not only does he speak as he
believes, he also acts according to his beliefs. AFAIK he has never
taken a backhander, freebie or other inducement to vote contrary to his
own conscience; he also has the lowest expenses record of any MP.
John (who is slightly to the right of centre)
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
