 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 03:11:36
Message: <542511a8$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-9-2014 17:48, Stephen wrote:
> On 25/09/2014 15:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 25-9-2014 14:18, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 25/09/2014 12:05, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>> On 25-9-2014 10:22, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And if the Devil conquered God and took his place. Who would be
>>>>> able to
>>>>> tell the difference?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Indeed. A certain form of Manichaeism is essential to distinguish good
>>>> from evil (what is good? what is evil?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Deep thoughts Thomas.
>>> Next we will be counting angels on pinheads. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> I would be even more fascinated by the question: Can there be as many
>> devils on a pinhead? or more? or less?
>>
>> Thomas
>>
> You don't catch me as easy as that.
>
> Get thee behind me... ;-)
>
Evading the answer, Brother Stephen?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 04:13:35
Message: <5425202f$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/09/2014 08:11, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Evading the answer, Brother Stephen?
First we will need to define a Devil.
Does a fallen angel take up more or less space than an angel who picked
the right side?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: andrel
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 04:48:53
Message: <54252860.80201@gmail.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-9-2014 10:13, Stephen wrote:
> On 26/09/2014 08:11, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Evading the answer, Brother Stephen?
>
> First we will need to define a Devil.
> Does a fallen angel take up more or less space than an angel who picked
> the right side?
>
My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the same
as for angels, but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
they immediately fall from the pinhead.
--
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 05:23:22
Message: <5425308a$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/09/2014 09:48, andrel wrote:
> My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the same
> as for angels,
I am drawn to that conclusion. too
> but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
> they immediately fall from the pinhead.
That could be because Angels dance more sedately.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 07:09:50
Message: <5425497e$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-9-2014 11:23, Stephen wrote:
> On 26/09/2014 09:48, andrel wrote:
>> My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the same
>> as for angels,
>
> I am drawn to that conclusion. too
>
>> but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
>> they immediately fall from the pinhead.
>
> That could be because Angels dance more sedately.
>
Now, now my Brothers, you are evading the /real/ answer!
Brother Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 08:01:05
Message: <54255581$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/09/2014 12:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 26-9-2014 11:23, Stephen wrote:
>> On 26/09/2014 09:48, andrel wrote:
>>> My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the same
>>> as for angels,
>>
>> I am drawn to that conclusion. too
>>
>>> but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
>>> they immediately fall from the pinhead.
>>
>> That could be because Angels dance more sedately.
>>
>
> Now, now my Brothers, you are evading the /real/ answer!
>
> Brother Thomas
I don't want to be the one to say that Santa Claus does not...
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 08:17:02
Message: <5425593e$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 26/09/2014 12:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 26-9-2014 11:23, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 26/09/2014 09:48, andrel wrote:
>>>> My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the
>>>> same
>>>> as for angels,
>>>
>>> I am drawn to that conclusion. too
>>>
>>>> but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
>>>> they immediately fall from the pinhead.
>>>
>>> That could be because Angels dance more sedately.
>>>
>>
>> Now, now my Brothers, you are evading the /real/ answer!
>>
>> Brother Thomas
>
> I don't want to be the one to say that Santa Claus does not...
>
Dude! Spoilers should be called in the header! Not cool!
*cries*
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: andrel
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 08:23:06
Message: <54255A95.2030402@gmail.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-9-2014 14:17, Francois Labreque wrote:
>> On 26/09/2014 12:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 26-9-2014 11:23, Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 26/09/2014 09:48, andrel wrote:
>>>>> My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the
>>>>> same
>>>>> as for angels,
>>>>
>>>> I am drawn to that conclusion. too
>>>>
>>>>> but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
>>>>> they immediately fall from the pinhead.
>>>>
>>>> That could be because Angels dance more sedately.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Now, now my Brothers, you are evading the /real/ answer!
>>>
>>> Brother Thomas
>>
>> I don't want to be the one to say that Santa Claus does not...
>>
> Dude! Spoilers should be called in the header! Not cool!
>
> *cries*
>
That Santa Claus does not drink beer is so well known that it is hardly
a spoiler IMO.
--
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 09:05:14
Message: <5425648a$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26/09/2014 13:17, Francois Labreque wrote:
>> I don't want to be the one to say that Santa Claus does not...
>>
> Dude! Spoilers should be called in the header! Not cool!
>
> *cries*
>
Okay I was going to say:
Winters in Australia. It is New Zealand he goes to.
So there. You made me do it!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Christian Fundamentalists in the USA - change of favorite enemy?
Date: 26 Sep 2014 10:04:42
Message: <5425727a$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-9-2014 14:01, Stephen wrote:
> On 26/09/2014 12:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 26-9-2014 11:23, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 26/09/2014 09:48, andrel wrote:
>>>> My guess is that in theory the number of devils on a pinhead is the
>>>> same
>>>> as for angels,
>>>
>>> I am drawn to that conclusion. too
>>>
>>>> but that in practice there is no time to collect them as
>>>> they immediately fall from the pinhead.
>>>
>>> That could be because Angels dance more sedately.
>>>
>>
>> Now, now my Brothers, you are evading the /real/ answer!
>>
>> Brother Thomas
>
> I don't want to be the one to say that Santa Claus does not...
>
Order! Order!
Thomas
PS: This is fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
