Le 28/05/2014 18:54, Doctor John nous fit lire :
> On 28/05/14 17:39, clipka wrote:
>> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though eerily
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>
>>> spooky
>>
>>
>> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>>
> 
> I second that.

It's not my task to do that challenge, but I do not see the problem.
(Hint: I would play "Disneyland", or "city" or "fair", or whatever place
in one word to close the sentence)

I would have challenged the position with a star (but it was not mine to
do, was it ?):

Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though *
eerily and * spooky



> 
> Clipka, start the next sentence (BTW You don't need to wait for
> confirmation of the challenge)
> 
> John
> 
I'm ok with Clipka starting the next sentence.

-- 
IQ of crossposters with FU: 100 / (number of groups)
IQ of crossposters without FU: 100 / (1 + number of groups)
IQ of multiposters: 100 / ( (number of groups) * (number of groups))

Post a reply to this message

On 28/05/14 18:10, Le_Forgeron wrote
>>
> I'm ok with Clipka starting the next sentence.
> 
The challenger always starts the next sentence unless, of course, he/she
doesn't want to.
Samantha doesn't want to rub you up the wrong way so she has offered to
let you go first ;-)

John
-- 
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children

Post a reply to this message

On 28/05/2014 17:39, clipka wrote:
> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though eerily
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>
>> spooky
>
>
> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>

I won't complete it but I will continue it.

and

(so there!) :-P

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 28/05/14 18:54, Stephen wrote:
> On 28/05/2014 17:39, clipka wrote:
>> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though
>>>>> eerily
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>
>>> spooky
>>
>>
>> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>>
> 
> I won't complete it but I will continue it.
> 
> and
> 
> (so there!) :-P
> 

BEEP! Incorrect grammar. 'eerily' is an adverb, 'spooky' is an adjective.


Unusually

John
-- 
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 28 May 2014 19:02:20 +0100, Doctor John wrote:

> On 28/05/14 18:54, Stephen wrote:
>> On 28/05/2014 17:39, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though
>>>>>> eerily
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> spooky
>>>
>>>
>>> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>>>
>>>
>> I won't complete it but I will continue it.
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> (so there!) :-P
>> 
>> 
> BEEP! Incorrect grammar. 'eerily' is an adverb, 'spooky' is an
> adjective.
> 
> 
> Unusually

yet



-- 
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and 
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw

Post a reply to this message

On 28/05/2014 19:02, Doctor John wrote:
> On 28/05/14 18:54, Stephen wrote:
>> On 28/05/2014 17:39, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though
>>>>>> eerily
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> spooky
>>>
>>>
>>> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>>>
>>
>> I won't complete it but I will continue it.
>>
>> and
>>
>> (so there!) :-P
>>
>
> BEEP! Incorrect grammar. 'eerily' is an adverb, 'spooky' is an adjective.
>
>
I was speaking American English (no rules to speak of) for our guests.

> Unusually
>

[It is not unusual] ;-)


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Am 28.05.2014 19:54, schrieb Stephen:
> On 28/05/2014 17:39, clipka wrote:
>> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though
>>>>> eerily
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>
>>> spooky
>>
>>
>> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>>
>
> I won't complete it but I will continue it.
>
> and
>
> (so there!) :-P

BEEP - the challenged player failed to, within one post, produce a valid 
English sentence starting with the words already played.

You lose, no matter what derivative of the English language you claim to 
be using :-P

Post a reply to this message

Am 28.05.2014 18:54, schrieb Doctor John:

> Clipka, start the next sentence (BTW You don't need to wait for
> confirmation of the challenge)


Once...

Post a reply to this message

On 28/05/2014 19:50, clipka wrote:
> Am 28.05.2014 19:54, schrieb Stephen:
>> On 28/05/2014 17:39, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 28.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Stephen:
>>>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:03:04 +0200, clipka wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pigswill Stilton has inadequately been to another casual, though
>>>>>> eerily
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> spooky
>>>
>>>
>>> You are hereby challenged to complete that sentence.
>>>
>>
>> I won't complete it but I will continue it.
>>
>> and
>>
>> (so there!) :-P
>
> BEEP - the challenged player failed to, within one post, produce a valid
> English sentence starting with the words already played.
>
> You lose, no matter what derivative of the English language you claim to
> be using :-P
>


we had been playing to the Royal and Ancient rules you would be 
perfectly correct. But as it is, you are in Knapp.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 28/05/2014 19:51, clipka wrote:
> Am 28.05.2014 18:54, schrieb Doctor John:
>
>> Clipka, start the next sentence (BTW You don't need to wait for
>> confirmation of the challenge)
>
>
> Once...
>

Buzz! Hesitation.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message