 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Hi guys. Can I get a list of all the file formats we don't support?"
*facepalm*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 31.01.2014 21:14, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:
> "Hi guys. Can I get a list of all the file formats we don't support?"
>
> *facepalm*
"Sure, if you give me a list of all the file formats that exist."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 31/01/2014 21:26, clipka nous fit lire :
> Am 31.01.2014 21:14, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:
>> "Hi guys. Can I get a list of all the file formats we don't support?"
>>
>> *facepalm*
>
> "Sure, if you give me a list of all the file formats that exist."
>
We do not support all file formats but the ones that we support.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/01/14 20:14, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> "Hi guys. Can I get a list of all the file formats we don't support?"
>
> *facepalm*
Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior Management.
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 31.01.2014 23:45, schrieb Doctor John:
> On 31/01/14 20:14, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>> "Hi guys. Can I get a list of all the file formats we don't support?"
>>
>> *facepalm*
>
> Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior Management.
I'd rather guess they already have a bright /history/ in Senior
Management...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:19:11 +0100, clipka wrote:
> Am 31.01.2014 23:45, schrieb Doctor John:
>> On 31/01/14 20:14, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>> "Hi guys. Can I get a list of all the file formats we don't support?"
>>>
>>> *facepalm*
>>
>> Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior
>> Management.
>
> I'd rather guess they already have a bright /history/ in Senior
> Management...
Well, some sort of history. ;)
Jim
--
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior
>>> Management.
>>
>> I'd rather guess they already have a bright /history/ in Senior
>> Management...
>
> Well, some sort of history. ;)
Yes, this is a question direct from our MD, so...
We quite often asks us what features we *don't* have. There's a logic
there - whatever feature we don't have, that's probably what we want to
go implement next. Except... this set is extremely poorly defined!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 01.02.2014 10:34, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:
>>>> Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior
>>>> Management.
>>>
>>> I'd rather guess they already have a bright /history/ in Senior
>>> Management...
>>
>> Well, some sort of history. ;)
>
> Yes, this is a question direct from our MD, so...
>
> We quite often asks us what features we *don't* have. There's a logic
> there - whatever feature we don't have, that's probably what we want to
> go implement next. Except... this set is extremely poorly defined!
Sounds more like the sales department is poorly "defined". Shouldn't
they keep an eye open to what customers are asking for, and what the
competitors are offering?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2014-02-01 12:42, clipka a écrit :
> Am 01.02.2014 10:34, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:
>>>>> Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior
>>>>> Management.
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather guess they already have a bright /history/ in Senior
>>>> Management...
>>>
>>> Well, some sort of history. ;)
>>
>> Yes, this is a question direct from our MD, so...
>>
>> We quite often asks us what features we *don't* have. There's a logic
>> there - whatever feature we don't have, that's probably what we want to
>> go implement next. Except... this set is extremely poorly defined!
>
> Sounds more like the sales department is poorly "defined". Shouldn't
> they keep an eye open to what customers are asking for, and what the
> competitors are offering?
>
Yes, but they're not technical enough to understand that mumbo jumbo, so
they're asking the techies, in this case, Andy and his team.
It reminds me of a dilbert Cartoon where the Pointy-Haired-Boss asked
Wally and Dilbert what was the model number of their competitor's
product, and they replied "the 6000." So, of course, the PHB asked them
to design a 7000.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 01/02/2014 18:42, clipka nous fit lire :
> Am 01.02.2014 10:34, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:
>>>>> Whoever asked you the question has got a bright future in Senior
>>>>> Management.
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather guess they already have a bright /history/ in Senior
>>>> Management...
>>>
>>> Well, some sort of history. ;)
>>
>> Yes, this is a question direct from our MD, so...
>>
>> We quite often asks us what features we *don't* have. There's a logic
>> there - whatever feature we don't have, that's probably what we want to
>> go implement next. Except... this set is extremely poorly defined!
>
> Sounds more like the sales department is poorly "defined". Shouldn't
> they keep an eye open to what customers are asking for, and what the
> competitors are offering?
>
In every organisation, there is someone which is aware of all the
weakness of such organisation. That one should be fired.
Congratulations, you're fired!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
