 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/19/2013 03:28 PM, Warp wrote:
> Aydan <hes### [at] hendrik-sachse net> wrote:
>> [-- text/plain, encoding 8bit, charset: iso-8859-1, 13 lines --]
>
>> James Holsenback <nom### [at] nonecom> wrote:
>>> sorry don't speak python, why isn't this an array of tupels ....
>>>
>>> p4viewspec=[
>>> [snip]
>
>> It definitely is a list of tupels, the question is if the contents are as
>> expected by whatever program.
>
> What the heck is a tupel?
>
besides ... you knew what i meant :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 19/12/2013 08:28 PM, Warp wrote:
> What the heck is a tupel?
Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:20:46 +0000, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 19/12/2013 08:28 PM, Warp wrote:
>
>> What the heck is a tupel?
>
> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
No.
Chakotay was Janeway's second in command. Tupok was the science officer.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> What the heck is a tupel?
>>
>> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
>
> No.
>
> Chakotay was Janeway's second in command. Tupok was the science officer.
Also works if you say "science officer in Star Trek: Enterprise". ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:43:20 +0000, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>>> What the heck is a tupel?
>>>
>>> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Chakotay was Janeway's second in command. Tupok was the science
>> officer.
>
> Also works if you say "science officer in Star Trek: Enterprise". ;-)
Except that was Voyager. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 22.12.2013 20:38, schrieb Jim Henderson:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:20:46 +0000, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>
>> On 19/12/2013 08:28 PM, Warp wrote:
>>
>>> What the heck is a tupel?
>>
>> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
>
> No.
>
> Chakotay was Janeway's second in command. Tupok was the science officer.
Wasn't it "Tuvok"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:50:27 +0100, clipka wrote:
> Am 22.12.2013 20:38, schrieb Jim Henderson:
>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:20:46 +0000, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/12/2013 08:28 PM, Warp wrote:
>>>
>>>> What the heck is a tupel?
>>>
>>> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Chakotay was Janeway's second in command. Tupok was the science
>> officer.
>
> Wasn't it "Tuvok"?
Egads, you're right. How did I screw that up? ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22/12/2013 22:56, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:50:27 +0100, clipka wrote:
>
>> Am 22.12.2013 20:38, schrieb Jim Henderson:
>>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:20:46 +0000, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19/12/2013 08:28 PM, Warp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What the heck is a tupel?
>>>>
>>>> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> Chakotay was Janeway's second in command. Tupok was the science
>>> officer.
>>
>> Wasn't it "Tuvok"?
>
> Egads, you're right. How did I screw that up? ;)
>
> Jim
>
Old age?
John (the eloder)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:40:22 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
>>> Wasn't it "Tuvok"?
>>
>> Egads, you're right. How did I screw that up? ;)
>>
> Old age?
Well, middle-age. ;) But I am wondering where the hell the last 20 years
went. Of course, the last (checks) 17 have been pretty good. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid Win7 v1 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > What the heck is a tupel?
> Isn't he the second in command to Janeway?
The only thing that it reminds me of is a toupee. (You could almost
convince the average person that "tupel" is how "toupee" is written
in French.)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
