 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/11/13 12:06, clipka wrote:
>
> Voice from the off:
>
> "Did not. But the referees are still busy discussing whether 'The Heath'
> was meant to denote the area in Uttoxeter, the place in the civil parish
> of Leintwardine, or a golf club near Portlaoise. The latter may actually
> have constituted a legal move even after John's cunning move to the
> Street of Cunning Artificers. Stephen, what is your handicap?"
>
He can't afford to drink a decent malt whisky more than once a week. :-D
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 04:48:17 -0500, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 04:30:24 -0500, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> > Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:52:40 -0500, Stephen wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> > From Vittorio Emanuele re d'italia one naturally thinks of the
>> >> > master who wrote Giovanna d'Arco. Who when on his deathbed, the
>> >> > residents of Milan covered the streets outside his house with
>> >> > straw. Which links to Jack Straw's Castle. So Hampstead Heath
>> >>
>> >> Repetition!
>> >
>> > Straw and straw's ^o^
>>
>> No, you repeated Hampstead Heath. :)
>>
>> Jim
>
> Did not.
"The Heath"?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:47:41 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
> On 21/11/13 09:48, Stephen wrote:
>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>> No, you repeated Hampstead Heath. :)
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> Did not.
>>
>>
> Must have been an echo, then as in: john@aphrodite:~> echo "Hampstead
> Heath"
> Hampstead Heath
That was quite a long period between the original and the echo, though.
If I'd known it was a different "The Heath," I'd have made a different
move. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/11/2013 6:07 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> "The Heath"?
Different branch of the thread during a hiatus.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/11/2013 5:45 PM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 21/11/13 12:06, clipka wrote:
>>
>> Voice from the off:
>>
>> "Did not. But the referees are still busy discussing whether 'The Heath'
>> was meant to denote the area in Uttoxeter, the place in the civil parish
>> of Leintwardine, or a golf club near Portlaoise. The latter may actually
>> have constituted a legal move even after John's cunning move to the
>> Street of Cunning Artificers. Stephen, what is your handicap?"
>>
>
> He can't afford to drink a decent malt whisky more than once a week. :-D
>
He prefers rotgut and leaves the malt for Poseurs with more money than...
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your video.:)
It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20/11/2013 8:20 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 05:39:43 -0500, Stephen wrote:
>
>> John get the points and points mean the sharp end of a needle.
>> What do points mean?
>
> Junctions on railway lines!
>
> Jim
>
:-D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/13 09:31, Stephen wrote:
> On 21/11/2013 5:45 PM, Doctor John wrote:
>>
>> He can't afford to drink a decent malt whisky more than once a week. :-D
>>
>
> He prefers rotgut and leaves the malt for Poseurs with more money than...
>
Poseur? Moi? :-)
John (wearing an Armani suit and a handmade silk shirt)
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/2013 11:11 AM, Doctor John wrote:
> Poseur? Moi?:-)
>
> John (wearing an Armani suit and a handmade silk shirt)
With 'tash
(Stephen jealous 'cause at his advanced age, he still can't grow one.) ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/13 11:16, Stephen wrote:
> On 23/11/2013 11:11 AM, Doctor John wrote:
>> Poseur? Moi?:-)
>>
>> John (wearing an Armani suit and a handmade silk shirt)
>
> With 'tash
>
> (Stephen jealous 'cause at his advanced age, he still can't grow one.) ;-)
>
So with all the money you save on razor blades you could afford to
upgrade your whisky ;-)
I'll post a selfie on November 30th. The 'tash is coming off on December
1st.
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/2013 11:41 AM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 23/11/13 11:16, Stephen wrote:
>> On 23/11/2013 11:11 AM, Doctor John wrote:
>>> Poseur? Moi?:-)
>>>
>>> John (wearing an Armani suit and a handmade silk shirt)
>>
>> With 'tash
>>
>> (Stephen jealous 'cause at his advanced age, he still can't grow one.) ;-)
>>
>
> So with all the money you save on razor blades you could afford to
> upgrade your whisky ;-)
What is there about "I prefer drinking the low flyer (Grouse)" that
people will not understand? :-)
As for buying razors a cheap disposable will last me 5 to 6 weeks. So
the cost does not signify.
> I'll post a selfie on November 30th. The 'tash is coming off on December
> 1st.
>
If you must. :-P
No. It will give others the chance to admire and wonder. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/13 13:11, Stephen wrote:
>
> What is there about "I prefer drinking the low flyer (Grouse)" that
> people will not understand? :-)
Of all the blended whiskies, the Grouse is probably the best. Offer me
one and I'll drink it.
>
> If you must. :-P
> No. It will give others the chance to admire and wonder. ;-)
>
Do I detect a note of envy in there?
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/2013 1:46 PM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 23/11/13 13:11, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> What is there about "I prefer drinking the low flyer (Grouse)" that
>> people will not understand? :-)
>
> Of all the blended whiskies, the Grouse is probably the best. Offer me
> one and I'll drink it.
>
I bet! ;-)
J & B is drinkable too. A bit too mild for my taste. As long as it is
not peaty I will coat my throat.
>>
>> If you must. :-P
>> No. It will give others the chance to admire and wonder. ;-)
>>
>
> Do I detect a note of envy in there?
>
No, not in the slightest. I am happy that I do not have a heavy growth.
It makes life easier. (I never had to worry about looking manly. I don't
care and as for maturity, my early onset silver hair (at 13) takes care
of that.)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/13 14:05, Stephen wrote:
>
> J & B is drinkable too. A bit too mild for my taste. As long as it is
> not peaty I will coat my throat.
>
...and there's where we differ. The peatier, the better. If there's a
touch of iodine in there, then I'm in Heaven. Hence, my love of the
Islay malts.
> No, not in the slightest. I am happy that I do not have a heavy growth.
> It makes life easier. (I never had to worry about looking manly. I don't
> care and as for maturity, my early onset silver hair (at 13) takes care
> of that.)
>
So, how young were you when you got served in a pub unchallenged? In my
case, I had serious chest hair at 15/16 so no problem there provided I
left the top two buttons of my shirt undone. I wasn't asked my age until
I was 21 but I think the landlord was just being perverse.
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/11/2013 2:56 PM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 23/11/13 14:05, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> J & B is drinkable too. A bit too mild for my taste. As long as it is
>> not peaty I will coat my throat.
>>
>
> ....and there's where we differ. The peatier, the better. If there's a
> touch of iodine in there, then I'm in Heaven. Hence, my love of the
> Islay malts.
>
I am in the minority, I realise.
>> No, not in the slightest. I am happy that I do not have a heavy growth.
>> It makes life easier. (I never had to worry about looking manly. I don't
>> care and as for maturity, my early onset silver hair (at 13) takes care
>> of that.)
>>
>
> So, how young were you when you got served in a pub unchallenged? In my
> case, I had serious chest hair at 15/16 so no problem there provided I
> left the top two buttons of my shirt undone. I wasn't asked my age until
> I was 21 but I think the landlord was just being perverse.
Now there is a thing. I started going to pubs when I was 15 occasionally
at lunch time while I was at school. Almost as soon as I turned 18 I
started getting asked my age. The last time I was asked, was when I was
25. Go figure!
As for chest hair, I had three when I was 22. A few more now but not
enough to keep me warm.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:33:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your video.:)
>
> It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
Then we'll have to do a duet on that day. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:29:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 21/11/2013 6:07 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> "The Heath"?
>
> Different branch of the thread during a hiatus.
Both moves in the same game, though. This wasn't Marshall's Variation,
otherwise it would've been legal.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 11:16:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 23/11/2013 11:11 AM, Doctor John wrote:
>> Poseur? Moi?:-)
>>
>> John (wearing an Armani suit and a handmade silk shirt)
>
> With 'tash
>
> (Stephen jealous 'cause at his advanced age, he still can't grow one.)
> ;-)
Heh, I can't grow a beard - but I have a 'tash of sorts. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:29:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 21/11/2013 6:07 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> "The Heath"?
>>
>> Different branch of the thread during a hiatus.
>
> Both moves in the same game, though. This wasn't Marshall's Variation,
> otherwise it would've been legal.
>
Hold on Jack, eh! Jim. Nurse will be along in a moment to take you home. ;-)
Must remember that we are not on the radio and side comments are allowed.
John won fair and square.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:33:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your video.:)
>>
>> It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
>
> Then we'll have to do a duet on that day. ;)
>
Okay, when Humagalum Tuesday falls an a Wednesday.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:47:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:29:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/11/2013 6:07 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> "The Heath"?
>>>
>>> Different branch of the thread during a hiatus.
>>
>> Both moves in the same game, though. This wasn't Marshall's Variation,
>> otherwise it would've been legal.
>>
>>
> Hold on Jack, eh! Jim. Nurse will be along in a moment to take you home.
> ;-)
>
> Must remember that we are not on the radio and side comments are
> allowed.
>
> John won fair and square.
Oh, I'm not disputing that. But multiple branches of the same Heath are
a repetition, rooted in the same place. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:49:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:33:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your
>>>> video.:)
>>>
>>> It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
>>
>> Then we'll have to do a duet on that day. ;)
>>
>>
> Okay, when Humagalum Tuesday falls an a Wednesday.
It's a deal. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 6:36 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:49:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:33:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your
>>>>> video.:)
>>>>
>>>> It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
>>>
>>> Then we'll have to do a duet on that day. ;)
>>>
>>>
>> Okay, when Humagalum Tuesday falls an a Wednesday.
>
> It's a deal. :)
>
Aye, sae it is. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 6:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Oh, I'm not disputing that. But multiple branches of the same Heath are
> a repetition, rooted in the same place.;)
Not as an aside.
NURSE!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:42:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 6:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Oh, I'm not disputing that. But multiple branches of the same Heath
>> are a repetition, rooted in the same place.;)
>
> Not as an aside.
>
> NURSE!
Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
it in the end.
Although Sven does fancy your point.
;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:27:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
>
> Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
> it in the end.
That would seem to be incentive to not keep my mouth closed, then. ;)
> Although Sven does fancy your point.
>
> ;-)
LOL
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 9:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:27:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
>>
>> Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
>> it in the end.
>
> That would seem to be incentive to not keep my mouth closed, then. ;)
>
As Sven is a little strapped for cash and is looking for some way to
supplement his income. He says that he would be willing to try any
opening he comes across. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:15:34 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 9:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:27:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
>>>
>>> Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
>>> it in the end.
>>
>> That would seem to be incentive to not keep my mouth closed, then. ;)
>>
>>
>
> As Sven is a little strapped for cash and is looking for some way to
> supplement his income. He says that he would be willing to try any
> opening he comes across. ;-)
Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking, giving
him the opening he's looking for. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:47:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
And I still somehow have managed to not actually hear the song. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:47:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
> > Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
> >
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
>
> And I still somehow have managed to not actually hear the song. ;)
>
> Jim
Count your blessings.
Once you hear it, you keep on hearing it. :-(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:07:00 -0500, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:47:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> > Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
>> >
>> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
>>
>> And I still somehow have managed to not actually hear the song. ;)
>>
>> Jim
>
> Count your blessings.
> Once you hear it, you keep on hearing it. :-(
I've tried very hard to avoid it. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking, giving
> him the opening he's looking for.;)
Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>
> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
Wuss. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29/11/13 21:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>>
>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>
> Wuss. ;)
>
> Jim
>
... and he can't stomach a decent Islay whisky :-D
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15/11/13 22:11, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:51:24 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
>
>> On 15/11/13 20:08, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>> Review > Language > Set Proofing Language
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> I think we may have tried that, but I'll check tomorrow. I'm at my own
>> flat atm; I'm watching England play Chile and football is verboten at
>> the Kat's pad.
>
> I have Office 2013 installed, and that seemed to do the trick - I did a
> short document in English and Spanish, selected the Spanish text and used
> the proofing tools to tell it it was Spanish, then ran a spellcheck and
> it corrected misspellings in both languages.
>
> Jim
>
Finally sorted it.
Unfortunately I've run out of beer tokens, will a whisky token be
acceptable?
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:26:31 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
> On 29/11/13 21:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>>>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>>>
>>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>>
>> Wuss. ;)
>>
>> Jim
>>
> ... and he can't stomach a decent Islay whisky :-D
There is that as well. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/11/2013 7:15 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:26:31 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
>
>> On 29/11/13 21:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>>>>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>>>
>>> Wuss. ;)
>>>
How well you know me. :-)
>>> Jim
>>>
>> ... and he can't stomach a decent Islay whisky :-D
>
Yes, it makes me boak.
> There is that as well. :)
>
Grounds for forced democratising? ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 09:10:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Wuss. ;)
>>>>
>>>>
> How well you know me. :-)
:)
I like hotter peppers myself, but I also don't eat them just for the heat
- I can actually taste the differences between them (I'm usually also not
eating them raw, as there's no point - other than to combat the side
effects of my allergies).
>> There is that as well. :)
>>
>>
> Grounds for forced democratising? ;-)
Or something. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/2013 6:54 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> I like hotter peppers myself, but I also don't eat them just for the heat
> - I can actually taste the differences between them (I'm usually also not
> eating them raw, as there's no point - other than to combat the side
> effects of my allergies).
>
I just said that for effect. I don't eat raw chillies. Although my wife
does. She keeps them in the freezer and will eat one if her stomach is
sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
Islay mist. ;-)
>>> There is that as well. :)
>>>
>>>
>> Grounds for forced democratising? ;-)
>
> Or something. ;)
>
:-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:58:22 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 6:54 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>
>> I like hotter peppers myself, but I also don't eat them just for the
>> heat - I can actually taste the differences between them (I'm usually
>> also not eating them raw, as there's no point - other than to combat
>> the side effects of my allergies).
>>
>>
> I just said that for effect. I don't eat raw chillies. Although my wife
> does. She keeps them in the freezer and will eat one if her stomach is
> sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
> Islay mist. ;-)
Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
chili pepper, so I'm told. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
> chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli Pipers.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:54:35 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
>> chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
>
> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
> Pipers.
They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/13 20:58, Stephen wrote:
>
> sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
> Islay mist. ;-)
>
...and you have a problem with that? Islay for the men and Irn Bru for
the boys :-D
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/12/2013 7:45 AM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 01/12/13 20:58, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
>> Islay mist. ;-)
>>
> ...and you have a problem with that?
Please find attached (below) a hint.
> Islay for the men
If you want to attract men, then.
> and Irn Bru for the boys :-D
>
Or the dentist. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cotton-bud.jpg' (19 KB)
Preview of image 'cotton-bud.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/12/2013 12:52 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:54:35 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
>>> chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
>>
>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
>> Pipers.
>
> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
>
I think so. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:37:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 12:52 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:54:35 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly
>>>> hot chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
>>>
>>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
>>> Pipers.
>>
>> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
>>
>>
> I think so. :-)
Though not exactly restful. :) Better as a wake-up soundtrack rather
than a "trying to fall asleep" soundtrack.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:37:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
> >>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
> >>> Pipers.
> >>
> >> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
> >>
> >>
> > I think so. :-)
>
> Though not exactly restful. :)
Well, the instrument is not designed for lullabies, I think.
Slow airs, maybe. :-)
> Better as a wake-up soundtrack rather
> than a "trying to fall asleep" soundtrack.
>
No arguments, there. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:21:43 -0500, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:37:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
>> >>> Pipers.
>> >>
>> >> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> > I think so. :-)
>>
>> Though not exactly restful. :)
>
> Well, the instrument is not designed for lullabies, I think.
> Slow airs, maybe. :-)
LOL, true enough. ;)
>> Better as a wake-up soundtrack rather than a "trying to fall asleep"
>> soundtrack.
>>
>>
> No arguments, there. ;-)
If being abruptly awake is your thing. I prefer a gradual wake-up. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
