 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:49:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:33:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your
>>>> video.:)
>>>
>>> It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
>>
>> Then we'll have to do a duet on that day. ;)
>>
>>
> Okay, when Humagalum Tuesday falls an a Wednesday.
It's a deal. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 6:36 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:49:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/2013 5:21 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:33:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/11/2013 6:32 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> It was a right challenge, and I really can't wait to see your
>>>>> video.:)
>>>>
>>>> It will be a cold day in Hell when I sing in public. ;-)
>>>
>>> Then we'll have to do a duet on that day. ;)
>>>
>>>
>> Okay, when Humagalum Tuesday falls an a Wednesday.
>
> It's a deal. :)
>
Aye, sae it is. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 6:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Oh, I'm not disputing that. But multiple branches of the same Heath are
> a repetition, rooted in the same place.;)
Not as an aside.
NURSE!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:42:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 6:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Oh, I'm not disputing that. But multiple branches of the same Heath
>> are a repetition, rooted in the same place.;)
>
> Not as an aside.
>
> NURSE!
Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
it in the end.
Although Sven does fancy your point.
;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:27:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
>
> Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
> it in the end.
That would seem to be incentive to not keep my mouth closed, then. ;)
> Although Sven does fancy your point.
>
> ;-)
LOL
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/11/2013 9:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:27:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
>>
>> Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
>> it in the end.
>
> That would seem to be incentive to not keep my mouth closed, then. ;)
>
As Sven is a little strapped for cash and is looking for some way to
supplement his income. He says that he would be willing to try any
opening he comes across. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:15:34 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/11/2013 9:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:27:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/11/2013 8:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Who's the referee here? I think we need an ajudication....
>>>
>>> Samantha and she says that if you keep your mouth closed. You will get
>>> it in the end.
>>
>> That would seem to be incentive to not keep my mouth closed, then. ;)
>>
>>
>
> As Sven is a little strapped for cash and is looking for some way to
> supplement his income. He says that he would be willing to try any
> opening he comes across. ;-)
Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking, giving
him the opening he's looking for. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:47:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
And I still somehow have managed to not actually hear the song. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:47:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
> > Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
> >
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
>
> And I still somehow have managed to not actually hear the song. ;)
>
> Jim
Count your blessings.
Once you hear it, you keep on hearing it. :-(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:07:00 -0500, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:47:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> > Here is something to give you ideas. :-)
>> >
>> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20582176
>>
>> And I still somehow have managed to not actually hear the song. ;)
>>
>> Jim
>
> Count your blessings.
> Once you hear it, you keep on hearing it. :-(
I've tried very hard to avoid it. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking, giving
> him the opening he's looking for.;)
Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>
> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
Wuss. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29/11/13 21:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>>
>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>
> Wuss. ;)
>
> Jim
>
... and he can't stomach a decent Islay whisky :-D
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15/11/13 22:11, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:51:24 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
>
>> On 15/11/13 20:08, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>> Review > Language > Set Proofing Language
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> I think we may have tried that, but I'll check tomorrow. I'm at my own
>> flat atm; I'm watching England play Chile and football is verboten at
>> the Kat's pad.
>
> I have Office 2013 installed, and that seemed to do the trick - I did a
> short document in English and Spanish, selected the Spanish text and used
> the proofing tools to tell it it was Spanish, then ran a spellcheck and
> it corrected misspellings in both languages.
>
> Jim
>
Finally sorted it.
Unfortunately I've run out of beer tokens, will a whisky token be
acceptable?
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:26:31 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
> On 29/11/13 21:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>>>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>>>
>>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>>
>> Wuss. ;)
>>
>> Jim
>>
> ... and he can't stomach a decent Islay whisky :-D
There is that as well. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/11/2013 7:15 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:26:31 +0000, Doctor John wrote:
>
>> On 29/11/13 21:49, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:34:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2013 6:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> Ah, now there's some incentive, fortunately, you've kept talking,
>>>>> giving him the opening he's looking for.;)
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>>>
>>> Wuss. ;)
>>>
How well you know me. :-)
>>> Jim
>>>
>> ... and he can't stomach a decent Islay whisky :-D
>
Yes, it makes me boak.
> There is that as well. :)
>
Grounds for forced democratising? ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 09:10:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>> Fortunately I eat raw Birds Eye chilli peppers. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Wuss. ;)
>>>>
>>>>
> How well you know me. :-)
:)
I like hotter peppers myself, but I also don't eat them just for the heat
- I can actually taste the differences between them (I'm usually also not
eating them raw, as there's no point - other than to combat the side
effects of my allergies).
>> There is that as well. :)
>>
>>
> Grounds for forced democratising? ;-)
Or something. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/2013 6:54 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> I like hotter peppers myself, but I also don't eat them just for the heat
> - I can actually taste the differences between them (I'm usually also not
> eating them raw, as there's no point - other than to combat the side
> effects of my allergies).
>
I just said that for effect. I don't eat raw chillies. Although my wife
does. She keeps them in the freezer and will eat one if her stomach is
sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
Islay mist. ;-)
>>> There is that as well. :)
>>>
>>>
>> Grounds for forced democratising? ;-)
>
> Or something. ;)
>
:-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:58:22 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 6:54 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>
>> I like hotter peppers myself, but I also don't eat them just for the
>> heat - I can actually taste the differences between them (I'm usually
>> also not eating them raw, as there's no point - other than to combat
>> the side effects of my allergies).
>>
>>
> I just said that for effect. I don't eat raw chillies. Although my wife
> does. She keeps them in the freezer and will eat one if her stomach is
> sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
> Islay mist. ;-)
Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
chili pepper, so I'm told. ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
> chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli Pipers.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:54:35 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
>> chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
>
> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
> Pipers.
They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/12/13 20:58, Stephen wrote:
>
> sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
> Islay mist. ;-)
>
...and you have a problem with that? Islay for the men and Irn Bru for
the boys :-D
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/12/2013 7:45 AM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 01/12/13 20:58, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> sore. I don't really like the taste of the hotter ones. Too much like
>> Islay mist. ;-)
>>
> ...and you have a problem with that?
Please find attached (below) a hint.
> Islay for the men
If you want to attract men, then.
> and Irn Bru for the boys :-D
>
Or the dentist. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cotton-bud.jpg' (19 KB)
Preview of image 'cotton-bud.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/12/2013 12:52 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:54:35 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly hot
>>> chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
>>
>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
>> Pipers.
>
> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
>
I think so. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:37:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 12:52 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:54:35 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/12/2013 9:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Well, yeah, I figured it was for effect. Sven also likes a fairly
>>>> hot chili pepper, so I'm told.;)
>>>
>>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
>>> Pipers.
>>
>> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
>>
>>
> I think so. :-)
Though not exactly restful. :) Better as a wake-up soundtrack rather
than a "trying to fall asleep" soundtrack.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:37:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
> >>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
> >>> Pipers.
> >>
> >> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
> >>
> >>
> > I think so. :-)
>
> Though not exactly restful. :)
Well, the instrument is not designed for lullabies, I think.
Slow airs, maybe. :-)
> Better as a wake-up soundtrack rather
> than a "trying to fall asleep" soundtrack.
>
No arguments, there. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:21:43 -0500, Stephen wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:37:40 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>> Personally, if it's not Cheech & Chong. I prefer the Red Hot Chilli
>> >>> Pipers.
>> >>
>> >> They are pretty good, aren't they? :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> > I think so. :-)
>>
>> Though not exactly restful. :)
>
> Well, the instrument is not designed for lullabies, I think.
> Slow airs, maybe. :-)
LOL, true enough. ;)
>> Better as a wake-up soundtrack rather than a "trying to fall asleep"
>> soundtrack.
>>
>>
> No arguments, there. ;-)
If being abruptly awake is your thing. I prefer a gradual wake-up. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
