 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I only remember the cover: A hooded figure with a reflecting glass covering
the face. Does this ring a bell?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 17/06/2012 09:09, Warp nous fit lire :
> I only remember the cover: A hooded figure with a reflecting glass covering
> the face. Does this ring a bell?
>
yes, Vidocq
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidocq_%282001_film%29
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] free fr> wrote:
> Le 17/06/2012 09:09, Warp nous fit lire :
> > I only remember the cover: A hooded figure with a reflecting glass covering
> > the face. Does this ring a bell?
> >
> yes, Vidocq
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidocq_%282001_film%29
Thank you. That's precisely what I was looking for.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17/06/2012 09:17 AM, Warp wrote:
> Thank you. That's precisely what I was looking for.
povray.off-topic > google.com
:-D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid Win7 v1 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> On 17/06/2012 09:17 AM, Warp wrote:
> > Thank you. That's precisely what I was looking for.
> povray.off-topic > google.com
> :-D
Maybe one day google will be so advanced that you can pose it a question
like the one I made in my original post, and it will be intelligent enough
to give you the correct results...
(And yes, I tried with everything I could think of before asking here. This
is really a case that basically no search keyword helps...)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Orchid Win7 v1<voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> povray.off-topic> google.com
Or, in words, "povray.off-topic is greater than google.com"
> Maybe one day google will be so advanced that you can pose it a question
> like the one I made in my original post, and it will be intelligent enough
> to give you the correct results...
Yeah. But I think that day is still some way away.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 18.06.2012 15:16, schrieb Warp:
> (And yes, I tried with everything I could think of before asking here. This
> is really a case that basically no search keyword helps...)
Not really - the search keyword "Vidocq" /would/ have helped...
<ducks & runs>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 18.06.2012 15:16, schrieb Warp:
> > (And yes, I tried with everything I could think of before asking here. This
> > is really a case that basically no search keyword helps...)
> Not really - the search keyword "Vidocq" /would/ have helped...
> <ducks & runs>
That's not a search keyword. That's the answer.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Not really - the search keyword "Vidocq" /would/ have helped...
>
>> <ducks& runs>
>
> That's not a search keyword. That's the answer.
It's like an NP decision problem; the solution can be easily verified,
but not easily computed.
(Except that it's not a decision problem. And we've not talking about
computation, we're talking about Google searches. And that this is a
horrible analogy...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 21.06.2012 16:58, schrieb Invisible:
>>> Not really - the search keyword "Vidocq" /would/ have helped...
>>
>>> <ducks& runs>
>>
>> That's not a search keyword. That's the answer.
>
> It's like an NP decision problem; the solution can be easily verified,
> but not easily computed.
>
> (Except that it's not a decision problem. And we've not talking about
> computation, we're talking about Google searches. And that this is a
> horrible analogy...)
Maybe deep down at the core of the problem it /is/ an NP decision problem?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
