 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
According to popular legend, caffeine is a powerful stimulant with
increases alertness, decreases reaction time, improves memory and
cognition, and decreases fatigue. It's also addictive, and if you stop
taking it, you develop crippling withdrawal symptoms such as headaches,
muscle soreness, joint pains and fatigue.
Question: Has ANYBODY ever actually experienced any of these effects?
Either from taking the drug or stopping it? Because *I* certainly haven't.
At various times in my life, there have been times when I'm drinking
several cups of strong tea every day, and there have been times when I
go for months without drinking any tea at all. I have never noticed any
measurable difference.
According to Wikipedia, the effects of caffeine are strong enough that
if you take enough of it, you can actually /die/ from it. (Although,
obviously, not from any quantity that you'll ever find in tea or
coffee.) So apparently the drug does do /something/. But I've yet to
experience any measurable effect.
Is it just me?
(Similarly, several people seem to think that eating large quantities of
sugar results in a "sugar rush", which I have also yet to experience.
Alternatively, maybe I live in a /permanent/ sugar rush, I don't know...)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> At various times in my life, there have been times when I'm drinking
> several cups of strong tea every day, and there have been times when I
> go for months without drinking any tea at all. I have never noticed any
> measurable difference.
A cup of tea contains a lot less caffeine than a cup of coffee. I drink a lot of
tea in start-stop patterns similar to yours, and I've never noticed the effect
either. But I've known people to stop drinking 6-10 cups of strong coffee a day,
and suffer the symptoms described...
Some people are more sensitive to it, too. I know at least one person who can't
sleep properly for days after having a single cup of tea.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Le 2012-06-15 08:11, Invisible a écrit :
> According to popular legend, caffeine is a powerful stimulant with
> increases alertness, decreases reaction time, improves memory and
> cognition, and decreases fatigue. It's also addictive, and if you stop
> taking it, you develop crippling withdrawal symptoms such as headaches,
> muscle soreness, joint pains and fatigue.
>
> Question: Has ANYBODY ever actually experienced any of these effects?
> Either from taking the drug or stopping it? Because *I* certainly haven't.
Yes. I used to drink 3 or 4 coffees, plus over a liter or Coke per day.
Went camping for a week-end, where neither of those were available, and
had one of the worst non-migraine-related headaches ever.
>
> At various times in my life, there have been times when I'm drinking
> several cups of strong tea every day, and there have been times when I
> go for months without drinking any tea at all. I have never noticed any
> measurable difference.
>
> According to Wikipedia, the effects of caffeine are strong enough that
> if you take enough of it, you can actually /die/ from it. (Although,
> obviously, not from any quantity that you'll ever find in tea or
> coffee.) So apparently the drug does do /something/. But I've yet to
> experience any measurable effect.
>
I've also had cases where i've taken too many coffees, when pulling
all-nighters at uni, or work, where I would have jitters. I guess it
was a combination of being tired and too much caffeine.
Which reminds me of my old .sig file that was a variation of the Mentat
incantation from the Dune movie that I had found on the Net:
"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion,
it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning,
it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion."
> Is it just me?
You've probably have not taken enough, or are not atuned to its effects,
so that even though they're there, you don't notice them (e.g. first
time pot smokers who don't notice they're high), or attribute them to
another cause (e.g. I used to think that having the flu made me have
weird claustrophobic nightmares, except I later found out it was a side
effect of the pseudoephedrine found in most flu medicine, and not of the
flu itself).
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:11:23 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Question: Has ANYBODY ever actually experienced any of these effects?
Yes. If I drink caffeinated beverages for a few days and then don't, I
get a really nasty headache.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 15/06/2012 3:11 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:11:23 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>
>> Question: Has ANYBODY ever actually experienced any of these effects?
>
> Yes. If I drink caffeinated beverages for a few days and then don't, I
> get a really nasty headache.
>
What’s a headache?
Like Andrew, I have never suffered withdrawal symptoms from caffeine.
Nor have I had a caffeine rush. I do like a coffee with sugar first
thing in the morning to “get me going” but no cravings if there is none.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:41:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 15/06/2012 3:11 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:11:23 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>
>>> Question: Has ANYBODY ever actually experienced any of these effects?
>>
>> Yes. If I drink caffeinated beverages for a few days and then don't, I
>> get a really nasty headache.
>>
>>
> What’s a headache?
Oh, I think you know what a headache is. Read a bunch of posts that
could be answered with "GIYF" and then find a brick wall to bang your
head against.
That'll surely cause one. ;)
> Like Andrew, I have never suffered withdrawal symptoms from caffeine.
> Nor have I had a caffeine rush. I do like a coffee with sugar first
> thing in the morning to “get me going” but no cravings if there is none.
Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with nutrition
guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because different people
react differently to things.
Which is why I laugh when I see a new report that says, for example, that
"high fat diets might just be good for you" - they always miss the "in
moderation" part.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 2012-06-15 18:27, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with nutrition
> guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because different people
> react differently to things.
No, they make perfect sense, as long as you understand them in the
context that they're /guidelines/ for the statistical norm. Not a set
of hard and fast rules for absolutely everybody.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.sjcook.com
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:08:20 -0500, Tim Cook wrote:
> On 2012-06-15 18:27, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with
>> nutrition guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because
>> different people react differently to things.
>
> No, they make perfect sense, as long as you understand them in the
> context that they're /guidelines/ for the statistical norm. Not a set
> of hard and fast rules for absolutely everybody.
Well, yeah, that's what I was going for. They make sense for that
statistical norm, but not for the individual if they don't work for the
individual.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 16/06/2012 12:27 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:41:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> What’s a headache?
>
> Oh, I think you know what a headache is.
Not from personal experience.
> Read a bunch of posts that
> could be answered with "GIYF" and then find a brick wall to bang your
> head against.
>
> That'll surely cause one. ;)
>
I would say that that would give you a sore head as opposed to the
headaches that I have read about. I seem to remember that I did have one
when I was a child but that is a memory of a memory, now. Very
occasionally, once every couple of years, I get an ice pick headache
which lasts less than a second. I don’t think that really counts though
as they don’t last long enough to have any debilitating effect.
Incidentally, I don’t get hangovers, either. And it is not that I don’t
drink ;-)
>
> Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with nutrition
> guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because different people
> react differently to things.
>
If you don't like the guidelines just wait a couple of years and they
are bound to change. :-)
> Which is why I laugh when I see a new report that says, for example, that
> "high fat diets might just be good for you" - they always miss the "in
> moderation" part.
>
My motto is moderation in everything including moderation.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 16/06/2012 06:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
> On 2012-06-15 18:27, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with nutrition
>> guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because different people
>> react differently to things.
>
> No, they make perfect sense, as long as you understand them in the
> context that they're /guidelines/ for the statistical norm. Not a set of
> hard and fast rules for absolutely everybody.
Personally, I think the guideline amounts would be more useful if they
gave you an ideal /range/ rather than just a single /point/. But who
cares what I think...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 6/15/2012 5:11, Invisible wrote:
> Question: Has ANYBODY ever actually experienced any of these effects? Either
> from taking the drug or stopping it? Because *I* certainly haven't.
It's pretty easy to get a headache from skipping your caffine if you're used
to it, yes.
The point to remember is that caffine works by blocking the bits that emit
the stuff that turns off your brain. (A very technical explanation, yes.)
However, if you take it long enough, you wind up growing new emitters to
account for the inefficiency of the ones you already have, so basically your
body adjusts to it and after a few weeks you're operating at the same level
you normally would be operating at.
> At various times in my life, there have been times when I'm drinking several
> cups of strong tea every day, and there have been times when I go for months
> without drinking any tea at all. I have never noticed any measurable
> difference.
You don't, after a few weeks.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:35:19 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>> Oh, I think you know what a headache is.
>
> Not from personal experience.
Sounds like further down, though, that 'ice pick' type thing is fairly
common. Just extend it for more than a few seconds.
>> Read a bunch of posts that could be answered with "GIYF" and then find
>> a brick wall to bang your head against.
>>
>> That'll surely cause one. ;)
>>
>>
> I would say that that would give you a sore head as opposed to the
> headaches that I have read about.
Well, I've had headaches that were like that, but migraines are quite
different, that's true. Every once in a while I get one where I see
white spots. Sometimes there is pain involved, sometimes not.
> Incidentally, I don’t get hangovers, either. And it is not that I don’t
> drink ;-)
That's handy. ;)
>> Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with
>> nutrition guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because
>> different people react differently to things.
>>
> If you don't like the guidelines just wait a couple of years and they
> are bound to change. :-)
Exactly. :)
>> Which is why I laugh when I see a new report that says, for example,
>> that "high fat diets might just be good for you" - they always miss the
>> "in moderation" part.
>>
>>
> My motto is moderation in everything including moderation.
Yup. :) Same here.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 10:03:13 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 06:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
>> On 2012-06-15 18:27, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Yeah, some people do not react the same way - which is why with
>>> nutrition guidelines, a lot of them make no sense at all, because
>>> different people react differently to things.
>>
>> No, they make perfect sense, as long as you understand them in the
>> context that they're /guidelines/ for the statistical norm. Not a set
>> of hard and fast rules for absolutely everybody.
>
> Personally, I think the guideline amounts would be more useful if they
> gave you an ideal /range/ rather than just a single /point/. But who
> cares what I think...
I happen to agree with that.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 6/15/2012 11:35 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 12:27 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:41:25 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>
>>> What’s a headache?
>>
>> Oh, I think you know what a headache is.
>
> Not from personal experience.
>
>> Read a bunch of posts that
>> could be answered with "GIYF" and then find a brick wall to bang your
>> head against.
>>
>> That'll surely cause one. ;)
>>
>
> I would say that that would give you a sore head as opposed to the
> headaches that I have read about. I seem to remember that I did have one
> when I was a child but that is a memory of a memory, now. Very
> occasionally, once every couple of years, I get an ice pick headache
> which lasts less than a second. I don’t think that really counts though
> as they don’t last long enough to have any debilitating effect.
> Incidentally, I don’t get hangovers, either. And it is not that I don’t
> drink ;-)
>
Read an interesting article that might kind of explain that, possibly.
Betting you don't experience "brain freeze" from cold drinks much
either? See, seems that, in some people, the vein that runs up the neck,
and into the brain, close to the spine, can try to "over protect". It
opens wider than normal, expanding enough that it triggers pain, in
order to increase blood flow, as a counter to what is assumed to be a
decrease in critical temperature. Caffeine, among other things, dilates
the blood vessels, I think? So, going off it, for some people, may
restrict blood flow, and again, you get an over-counter reaction.
Or, so the theory goes, based on watching the changes due to the brain
freeze effect, and noting a strong correlation between people that get
migraines, and their susceptibility to suffering that effect (i.e., they
get hit with it much faster, and much harder, when exposing themselves
to cold drinks). It kind of makes sense that other "spike in the head"
type headaches, short, or long term, are a result of this one blood
source overcompensating for an assumed threat. And, it makes sense that
some people's brains may recognize the overreaction, and curtail it,
much quicker than others.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 16/06/2012 10:50 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:35:19 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> Oh, I think you know what a headache is.
>>
>> Not from personal experience.
>
> Sounds like further down, though, that 'ice pick' type thing is fairly
> common. Just extend it for more than a few seconds.
>
It is quite difficult to reply to this without nit picking. (Won’t stop
me though.)
From my reading it is not very common, only 1 or 2 per cent of people
get them. The ones I get have almost no duration at all and are so
infrequent as to not be counted.
My understanding of common or garden headaches is that it feels like an
iron band around your head that is slowly tightening. Or that it is a
thumper where your head pounds with pain. These I don’t get.
My theory is that the headache I had as a child was so unpleasant that I
decided not to have any more.
>>> Read a bunch of posts that could be answered with "GIYF" and then find
>>> a brick wall to bang your head against.
>>>
>>> That'll surely cause one. ;)
>>>
>>>
>> I would say that that would give you a sore head as opposed to the
>> headaches that I have read about.
>
> Well, I've had headaches that were like that, but migraines are quite
> different, that's true. Every once in a while I get one where I see
> white spots. Sometimes there is pain involved, sometimes not.
>
I think that we are talking at cross purposes.
One of my brothers in law suffers badly from migraines and buys them
instead of hangovers. When the wine is in the sense is out etc.
I meant a pain in the head region is not necessarily a headache.
>> Incidentally, I don’t get hangovers, either. And it is not that I don’t
>> drink ;-)
>
> That's handy. ;)
>
It is and it isn’t. I don’t have the disincentive of hangovers to stop
me drinking too much.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 17/06/2012 5:25 AM, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Read an interesting article that might kind of explain that, possibly.
> Betting you don't experience "brain freeze" from cold drinks much
> either?
No, I've never even heard of it either.
> See, seems that, in some people, the vein that runs up the neck,
[snip]
> some people's brains may recognize the overreaction, and curtail it,
> much quicker than others.
Very interesting reading about it, in an academic sense.
I did get ice-cream toothache though.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:24:53 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> It is quite difficult to reply to this without nit picking. (Won’t stop
> me though.)
But of course. ;)
> From my reading it is not very common, only 1 or 2 per cent of people
> get them. The ones I get have almost no duration at all and are so
> infrequent as to not be counted.
But the pain is something you're familiar with. Just because it
approaches an average of zero over time.... ;)
> My understanding of common or garden headaches is that it feels like an
> iron band around your head that is slowly tightening. Or that it is a
> thumper where your head pounds with pain. These I don’t get.
I wouldn't know what an iron band around my head slowly tightening feels
like, but basically for me, there's a 'steady pain' and a 'thumping
pain'. What I've read about hangover headaches is that they're caused by
dehydration causing the brain to shrink slightly, and the pain is the
membrane attached to the skull being pulled (since the brain itself
doesn't feel pain at all).
> My theory is that the headache I had as a child was so unpleasant that I
> decided not to have any more.
You should teach that trick to the rest of us. ;)
>> Well, I've had headaches that were like that, but migraines are quite
>> different, that's true. Every once in a while I get one where I see
>> white spots. Sometimes there is pain involved, sometimes not.
>>
>>
> I think that we are talking at cross purposes.
I don't think so.
> One of my brothers in law suffers badly from migraines and buys them
> instead of hangovers. When the wine is in the sense is out etc.
Ken used to get them quite regularly as well - though he's found a change
in diet that has really helped a lot (not sure what it is, though).
> I meant a pain in the head region is not necessarily a headache.
Well, true.
>>> Incidentally, I don’t get hangovers, either. And it is not that I
>>> don’t drink ;-)
>>
>> That's handy. ;)
>>
>>
> It is and it isn’t. I don’t have the disincentive of hangovers to stop
> me drinking too much.
True....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 6/17/2012 2:24, Stephen wrote:
> One of my brothers in law suffers badly from migraines and buys them instead
> of hangovers. When the wine is in the sense is out etc.
FWIW, I figured out I'm alergic to sulfates. Try a bottle of un-sulfated
wine and see if you get the same effects.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 17/06/2012 10:25 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 6/17/2012 2:24, Stephen wrote:
>> One of my brothers in law suffers badly from migraines and buys them
>> instead
>> of hangovers. When the wine is in the sense is out etc.
>
> FWIW, I figured out I'm alergic to sulfates. Try a bottle of un-sulfated
> wine and see if you get the same effects.
>
In my youth I used to like amphetamine sulphate but I don’t suppose
that’s the same thing.
I misquoted, the phrase is "When the wine is in the wit is out".
I just meant that when people start to drink their senses are dulled and
they drink more than is good for them.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> At various times in my life, there have been times when I'm drinking
> several cups of strong tea every day
tea is not coffee. Tea is leaves, coffee is beans.
> Alternatively, maybe I live in a /permanent/ sugar rush, I don't know...)
We may very well live in that state, yes. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:47:12 -0400, nemesis wrote:
> tea is not coffee. Tea is leaves, coffee is beans.
Depending on the tea, though, it can have more caffeine than coffee.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|
 |