 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22/05/2012 2:31 PM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Le_Forgeron<lef### [at] free fr> wrote:
>> hint about Rhubarb (Exhibit A from Invisible): the leaf is toxic (as is
>> the root). This greatly reduces the impact of being eaten.
>>
>> (the branch is edible for human, stay away from leaf& root!).
>
> More than edible, it's downright tasty!
> :D
>
Raw, dipped in a poke of sugar. Yum yum.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Still doesn't explain why every type of tree has completely different
> leaves. Nor why it grows thousands of tiny ones rather than several big
> ones.
Wind is probably a huge factor.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22-5-2012 14:38, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 22/05/2012 10:07, scott a écrit :
>
>> 3) Leaves fail all the time, they get eaten, blown off, snapped off etc.
>> If you've only got a few large sheets then there isn't much redundancy
>> in the system, your tree will likely die if just 1 or 2 leaves get broken.
>
> hint about Rhubarb (Exhibit A from Invisible): the leaf is toxic (as is
> the root). This greatly reduces the impact of being eaten.
>
> (the branch is edible for human, stay away from leaf& root!).
I beg to differ. Rhubarb is not edible at all. (it is in fact the only
vegetable that is eaten only by others)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22/05/2012 03:56 PM, Warp wrote:
> Invisible<voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> Still doesn't explain why every type of tree has completely different
>> leaves. Nor why it grows thousands of tiny ones rather than several big
>> ones.
>
> Wind is probably a huge factor.
OK, yeah, that would explain why you don't want just one giant leaf.
Still not sure why every plant species has to have a completely
different leaf design.
Also, wind might explain why you'd want smaller leaves, but it doesn't
explain why you'd want leaves with wavy edges, or holes through the
middle, or any of the other strange shapes plants grow their leaves.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22/05/2012 09:07 AM, scott wrote:
> 4) With lots of small leaves it is easy for the tree to adjust to
> maximise the sunlight, it can let a few leaves die that are in shade and
> grow news ones to take advantage of extra light very quickly. With a
> small number of huge leaves that is not so easy.
OK. That seems like a good reason for not having just one giant leaf, or
a small number of very large leaves.
Now I just need to figure out why leaves come in such a vast array of
disparate shapes and sizes...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 22/05/2012 2:31 PM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> > Le_Forgeron<lef### [at] freefr> wrote:
> >> hint about Rhubarb (Exhibit A from Invisible): the leaf is toxic (as is
> >> the root). This greatly reduces the impact of being eaten.
> >>
> >> (the branch is edible for human, stay away from leaf& root!).
> >
> > More than edible, it's downright tasty!
> > :D
> >
>
> Raw, dipped in a poke of sugar. Yum yum.
Or roasted in honey. Or stewed and beaten into cream. Or baked in a crumble.
Or...
got loads of the stuff at the moment :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22/05/2012 5:28 PM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
>>
>> Raw, dipped in a poke of sugar. Yum yum.
>
> Or roasted in honey. Or stewed and beaten into cream. Or baked in a crumble.
> Or...
>
> got loads of the stuff at the moment :)
>
Me too but it costs an arm and a leg if you have to buy it. My
grandmother had a patch and every year I made Rhubarb wine. It blew up
once, fibres in the air lock. Messy!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 21.05.2012 12:51, schrieb Invisible:
> In particular, the purpose of leaves is to absorb as much sunlight as
> possible. Given that task, you would /expect/ leaves to evolve to be
> huge flat sheets. You would /not/ expect leaves to evolve holes and cuts
> in them. You certainly wouldn't expect to see long, thin, pointy leaves
> which hardly soak up any light at all.
Once again, your expectations suffer from oversimplification.
One other purpose of leaves, for instance, is gas exchange: Somehow the
plant needs to take up carbon dioxide and give off oxygen. "Fractal"
shapes are better suited to this, as they allow for better average
airflow across the surface.
For some plants, the leaves also serve the purpose of collecting water
from dew or rainfall; others use them to store water; yet others protect
the earth from erosion by heavy rain, and some need to manage to cope
with heavy snow.
And then there are secondary design criteria to be met; one of them is
self-defense: Small or "fractal" leaves provide better barriers against
the spread of degenerative diseases; certain structures might make life
more difficult for parasites (e.g. hindering migration from one side of
the leaf to the other), and/or make the respective predators' life easier.
Furthermore, leaves must be lightweight to allow for faster growth of
the plant, yet robust enough to withstand the prevailing wind speeds.
And in extremely hot or cold environments their surface must be limited
for better temperature management.
And I bet I only touched the surface of it.
> But plants of course are not designed by human thinking. They are
> designed by a far more reliable process: trial and error. The vast
> number of plants with weird shaped leaves demonstrates beyond question
> that this /works/, and that it provides some sort of advantage. But...
> what?
See above.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Also some leaves must be able to survive sub-freezing temperatures while
still carrying on photosynthesis (at least on a low level).
A tree trunk does more than get the leaves above the other plants. It
also gets the leaves up where deer can't eat them.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/22/2012 18:35, John VanSickle wrote:
> gets the leaves up where deer can't eat them.
Guess what grows where giraffes live?
http://media.treehugger.com/assets/images/2011/10/acacia-tree-africa.jpg
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
"Don't panic. There's beans and filters
in the cabinet."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
