POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Spoken languages in the past Server Time
12 Oct 2026 08:21:02 EDT (-0400)
  Spoken languages in the past (Message 1 to 25 of 25)  
From: Warp
Subject: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 28 Apr 2012 12:25:54
Message: <4f9c1a12@news.povray.org>
I have been wondering: How can we know how languages, even our own
languages, were spoken before the earliest surviving audio recordings?
Back then there weren't any meticulous (if any) pronounciation guides
for any language.

  For instance, how can we know if English was spoken in the 1500's even
close to what it is today? After all 500 years is a pretty long time, and
language (and its pronounciation) evolves. Even though we know how English
was written back then (and way, way earlier), how do we know how it was
spoken? (Sure, it was probably similar to current English, but to what
degree?)

  On top of that, we often have distortions of spoken languages of the
past in popular media. For instance, the pirates of the 1600's did most
certainly not speak like the stereotypical pirate talk ("Arrr! Avast, ye
scurvy dogs!") I think this is just an invention of relatively recent
works of fiction (I think it might have originated from "Treasure Island"
by Robert Louis Stevenson, published in 1883.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Kevin Wampler
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 28 Apr 2012 20:20:16
Message: <4f9c8940$1@news.povray.org>
On 4/28/2012 9:25 AM, Warp wrote:
>    I have been wondering: How can we know how languages, even our own
> languages, were spoken before the earliest surviving audio recordings?
> Back then there weren't any meticulous (if any) pronounciation guides
> for any language.
>
>    For instance, how can we know if English was spoken in the 1500's even
> close to what it is today?

You might be interested in this reading of Beowulf: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y13cES7MMd8&t=25  You can read on 
Wikipedia about what our state of knowledge about the pronunciation ff 
old English is.  You'll also be able to find plenty of readings of the 
Canterbury Tales if you want to hear Middle English.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 01:49:45
Message: <4f9cd679@news.povray.org>
Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
> You might be interested in this reading of Beowulf: 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y13cES7MMd8&t=25

  Sounds like a mixture between Old Norse and German.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 03:56:31
Message: <4f9cf42f$1@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 6:49 AM, Warp wrote:
> Kevin Wampler<wam### [at] uwashingtonedu>  wrote:
>> You might be interested in this reading of Beowulf:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y13cES7MMd8&t=25
>
>    Sounds like a mixture between Old Norse and German.
>
I would say that Beowulf is Old English so it is not surprising that it 
sounds like a mix between Old Norse and German, it is.

Middle English (between the late 11th and the late 15th century) can be 
found in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE0MtENfOMU


-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 05:18:48
Message: <4f9d0778@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> Middle English (between the late 11th and the late 15th century) can be 
> found in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE0MtENfOMU

  Sounds a bit Scottish.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 05:24:21
Message: <4f9d08c5@news.povray.org>
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>   Sounds a bit Scottish.

  I don't know if it's just because I'm tired, but I couldn't stop
laughing at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BncDeMO_en0

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 05:53:42
Message: <4f9d0fa6$1@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 10:24 AM, Warp wrote:
> Warp<war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:
>>    Sounds a bit Scottish.
>
>    I don't know if it's just because I'm tired, but I couldn't stop
> laughing at this:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BncDeMO_en0
>

:-(

This video contains content from Channel 5, who has blocked it in your 
country on copyright grounds.


-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 06:07:31
Message: <4f9d12e3$1@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 10:18 AM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mcavoys_at@aoldotcom>  wrote:
>> Middle English (between the late 11th and the late 15th century) can be
>> found in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.
>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE0MtENfOMU
>
>    Sounds a bit Scottish.
>
It does to my ears too. Old Scots, at least the West Coast variety 
sounds similar. But then it is descended from Middle English.
We studded Chaucer at school and I was never able to make heads or tails 
of it. A few years ago a friend recited a passage using a broad Scots 
accent. It suddenly became clear almost like listening to a Burn poem.

But still none of this answers your question?
How can we know how languages, even our own
languages, were spoken before the earliest surviving audio recordings?
Back then there weren't any meticulous (if any) pronunciation guides
for any language.

I don't know.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 06:25:11
Message: <4f9d1707@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 29/04/2012 10:24 AM, Warp wrote:
> > Warp<war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:
> >>    Sounds a bit Scottish.
> >
> >    I don't know if it's just because I'm tired, but I couldn't stop
> > laughing at this:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BncDeMO_en0
> >

> :-(

> This video contains content from Channel 5, who has blocked it in your 
> country on copyright grounds.

  What's the point?

  If you like, I could send you the .flv file, if you can play them.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 06:30:48
Message: <4f9d1858@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 29/04/2012 10:24 AM, Warp wrote:
> > Warp<war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:
> >>    Sounds a bit Scottish.
> >
> >    I don't know if it's just because I'm tired, but I couldn't stop
> > laughing at this:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BncDeMO_en0
> >

> :-(

> This video contains content from Channel 5, who has blocked it in your 
> country on copyright grounds.

  Maybe this will work:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5Wuwi9ZKxE

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 06:41:45
Message: <4f9d1ae9@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 11:30 AM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mcavoys_at@aoldotcom>  wrote:
>> On 29/04/2012 10:24 AM, Warp wrote:
>>> Warp<war### [at] tagpovrayorg>   wrote:
>>>>     Sounds a bit Scottish.
>>>
>>>     I don't know if it's just because I'm tired, but I couldn't stop
>>> laughing at this:
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BncDeMO_en0
>>>
>
>> :-(
>
>> This video contains content from Channel 5, who has blocked it in your
>> country on copyright grounds.
>
>    Maybe this will work:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5Wuwi9ZKxE
>

Nope! but I get the idea from the titles.
When the iphone 4 came out. BBC news sent a recording team to Aberdeen 
to check it out. In the clip below the policeman whose voice it 
recognised was from Dundee. A very different accent from the Aberdeen Doric.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-15475989

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 06:46:10
Message: <4f9d1bf2@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> Nope! but I get the idea from the titles.

  It's a comedy sketch. I don't think you get the idea without watching
it...

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 07:01:34
Message: <4f9d1f8e@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 11:46 AM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mcavoys_at@aoldotcom>  wrote:
>> Nope! but I get the idea from the titles.
>
>    It's a comedy sketch. I don't think you get the idea without watching
> it...
>

Okay, please send me the files.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 07:07:29
Message: <4f9d20f1@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> Okay, please send me the files.

  Grab it from here, and reply so that I know I can remove it:

http://kapsi.fi/warp/media/Elevator.flv

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 07:26:10
Message: <4f9d2552@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 12:07 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mcavoys_at@aoldotcom>  wrote:
>> Okay, please send me the files.
>
>    Grab it from here, and reply so that I know I can remove it:
>
> http://kapsi.fi/warp/media/Elevator.flv
>

Fine, you can remove it now. Funnily enough I did get the idea from the 
title.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 13:38:24
Message: <4f9d7c90$1@news.povray.org>
On 4/29/2012 0:56, Stephen wrote:
> I would say that Beowulf is Old English so it is not surprising that it
> sounds like a mix between Old Norse and German, it is.

I'm still with Warp on this one, tho. I want to know how they know this is 
what it sounded like. :-)  How does someone know what a language sounded 
like when nobody still speaks it?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 16:21:37
Message: <4f9da2d1$1@news.povray.org>
On 29/04/2012 6:38 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/29/2012 0:56, Stephen wrote:
>> I would say that Beowulf is Old English so it is not surprising that it
>> sounds like a mix between Old Norse and German, it is.
>
> I'm still with Warp on this one, tho. I want to know how they know this
> is what it sounded like. :-) How does someone know what a language
> sounded like when nobody still speaks it?
>

I still don't know but remember GIYE ;-P


-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Kevin Wampler
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 Apr 2012 20:27:10
Message: <4f9ddc5e@news.povray.org>
On 4/29/2012 10:38 AM, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/29/2012 0:56, Stephen wrote:
>> I would say that Beowulf is Old English so it is not surprising that it
>> sounds like a mix between Old Norse and German, it is.
>
> I'm still with Warp on this one, tho. I want to know how they know this
> is what it sounded like. :-) How does someone know what a language
> sounded like when nobody still speaks it?
>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English_phonology has some info on this.


Post a reply to this message

From: nemesis
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 30 Apr 2012 12:00:16
Message: <4f9eb710@news.povray.org>
On a related note, there are some who doubt a virtuoso pianist of the 
19th century such as Liszt were all the good (despite the account from 
other composers that he would play difficult concerto pieces on first 
sight) because there was no recording.

I've also heard some jazz guys suggesting Bach's music was played more 
relaxed back them, rhythm-wise.  Which is too say, it'd sound quite a 
lot like jazz, rather than with its characteristic rhythmic sameness 
found in recordings.

Forgetting the past and then reimagining it has led to many works of 
fiction as well.  The greek forgot their past mycennean civilization and 
came up with the Illiad to explain the many wars in oral legends and The 
ages of man to explain the bronze obssession of the previous bronze age 
civiliations.

I wonder how future civilizations will reimagine our dark digital age. 
"These guys surely were a quiet lot!"

-- 
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9


Post a reply to this message

From: Patrick Elliott
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 30 Apr 2012 22:14:57
Message: <4f9f4721$1@news.povray.org>
On 4/28/2012 10:49 PM, Warp wrote:
> Kevin Wampler<wam### [at] uwashingtonedu>  wrote:
>> You might be interested in this reading of Beowulf:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y13cES7MMd8&t=25
>
>    Sounds like a mixture between Old Norse and German.
>
Actually, from some of what I have read there was, until fairly 
recently, a "High German" and "Low German". The low version was very 
close to English, enough that it was fairly understandable.


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 22 May 2012 21:02:01
Message: <4fbc3709@news.povray.org>
On 4/30/2012 9:15 PM, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> On 4/28/2012 10:49 PM, Warp wrote:
>> Kevin Wampler<wam### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
>>> You might be interested in this reading of Beowulf:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y13cES7MMd8&t=25
>>
>> Sounds like a mixture between Old Norse and German.
>>
> Actually, from some of what I have read there was, until fairly
> recently, a "High German" and "Low German". The low version was very
> close to English, enough that it was fairly understandable.

High German, Low German, and Dutch are actually rather specific points 
along a very smooth spectrum.  I am told that if you were to walk from 
southern Austria up through Germany all the way up to the Netherlands, 
you will observe no sudden shifts in the speech of the locals at any 
given point.  The exceptions occur if you wander into a French-speaking 
area or a region whose inhabitants have consciously altered their 
dialect (in order to conform to another dialect).

In a like manner, walking from the tip of the boot of Italy, up the 
coast into France, and then down into Spain will result in to sudden 
shift in language along the way (although signs placed by the government 
will generally be in the official dialect).

Or I could be wrong.

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 23 May 2012 03:35:13
Message: <4fbc9331@news.povray.org>
> High German, Low German, and Dutch are actually rather specific points
> along a very smooth spectrum. I am told that if you were to walk from
> southern Austria up through Germany all the way up to the Netherlands,

You can even start in northern Italy rather than southern Austria.  Also 
I heard several times that when English people try to speak German it 
often sounds very Dutch, so I guess even though we (in England) have 
mutated the language a fair bit the accent is still there somehow to 
carry on the smooth progression across Europe.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 23 May 2012 10:17:05
Message: <4fbcf160@news.povray.org>
John VanSickle <evi### [at] kosherhotmailcom> wrote:
> High German, Low German, and Dutch are actually rather specific points 
> along a very smooth spectrum.  I am told that if you were to walk from 
> southern Austria up through Germany all the way up to the Netherlands, 
> you will observe no sudden shifts in the speech of the locals at any 
> given point.  The exceptions occur if you wander into a French-speaking 
> area or a region whose inhabitants have consciously altered their 
> dialect (in order to conform to another dialect).

> In a like manner, walking from the tip of the boot of Italy, up the 
> coast into France, and then down into Spain will result in to sudden 
> shift in language along the way (although signs placed by the government 
> will generally be in the official dialect).

  In contrast, if you were to walk from Sweden to Finland to Russia,
you'll find three languages that couldn't be much more distinct and
unintelligible to the others.

  (Of course inside Finland the dialect will change gradually from west
to east, but there are still very sharp divides between Swedish and
Finnish, and Finnish and Russian.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 29 May 2012 21:33:27
Message: <4fc578e7$1@news.povray.org>
On 5/23/2012 9:17 AM, Warp wrote:
> John VanSickle<evi### [at] kosherhotmailcom>  wrote:
>> High German, Low German, and Dutch are actually rather specific points
>> along a very smooth spectrum.  I am told that if you were to walk from
>> southern Austria up through Germany all the way up to the Netherlands,
>> you will observe no sudden shifts in the speech of the locals at any
>> given point.  The exceptions occur if you wander into a French-speaking
>> area or a region whose inhabitants have consciously altered their
>> dialect (in order to conform to another dialect).
>
>> In a like manner, walking from the tip of the boot of Italy, up the
>> coast into France, and then down into Spain will result in to sudden
>> shift in language along the way (although signs placed by the government
>> will generally be in the official dialect).
>
>    In contrast, if you were to walk from Sweden to Finland to Russia,
> you'll find three languages that couldn't be much more distinct and
> unintelligible to the others.
>
>    (Of course inside Finland the dialect will change gradually from west
> to east, but there are still very sharp divides between Swedish and
> Finnish, and Finnish and Russian.)

Primarily because at least two of these languages are next to the third 
because of recent (in linguistic terms) migrations.

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

From: Cousin Ricky
Subject: Re: Spoken languages in the past
Date: 30 May 2012 10:40:00
Message: <web.4fc630e5f1d38f0f85de7b680@news.povray.org>
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>   In contrast, if you were to walk from Sweden to Finland to Russia,
> you'll find three languages that couldn't be much more distinct and
> unintelligible to the others.

Swedish and Russian are both Indo-European languages.  Finnish, which is wedged
up between them, is totally unrelated.  It would be difficult to make a smooth
transition.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.