|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
OK, so does anybody know of a good tree C++ compiler for Windows?
I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
days it stops working and demands a license key.
I suppose there's always GCC - if I install a damned Unix emulator. >_<
I think Watcom used to make a C compiler...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid Win7 v1 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> OK, so does anybody know of a good tree C++ compiler for Windows?
> I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
> days it stops working and demands a license key.
Then get the license key. It's free.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 15/04/2012 12:26, Warp nous fit lire :
> Orchid Win7 v1 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> OK, so does anybody know of a good tree C++ compiler for Windows?
>
>> I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
>> days it stops working and demands a license key.
>
> Then get the license key. It's free.
>
I second that.
The license for MSVC 10 (or whatever) is free. And they are not even
trying to spam you with lot of email (I know, I had such key)
The real sickness of MSVC is the C compiler: K&R only. C++ is ok.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
>>> days it stops working and demands a license key.
>>
>> Then get the license key. It's free.
>>
> I second that.
>
> The license for MSVC 10 (or whatever) is free. And they are not even
> trying to spam you with lot of email (I know, I had such key)
I third that.
Had the C++ and C# express versions installed on all my machines for
ages now (and I think I needed to register for a new key each time I
installed, it took some trivial amount of time to get the key and enter
it, otherwise I would have remembered).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
>> days it stops working and demands a license key.
>
> Then get the license key. It's free.
As soon as I click the link, it wants me to "log in". Damned if I'm
going to jump through that many hoops just to use something that's
/supposed/ to be freely usable. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
>>> days it stops working and demands a license key.
>>
>> Then get the license key. It's free.
>
> As soon as I click the link, it wants me to "log in". Damned if I'm
> going to jump through that many hoops just to use something that's
> /supposed/ to be freely usable. :-P
So the value of having Visual Studio Express is less than one minute of
your time? Your time must be *really* expensive :-)
Personally (and I'm sure I'm not alone) I would happily have paid up to
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> I mistakenly thought VisualStudio Express was free, but in fact after X
> >> days it stops working and demands a license key.
> >
> > Then get the license key. It's free.
> As soon as I click the link, it wants me to "log in". Damned if I'm
> going to jump through that many hoops just to use something that's
> /supposed/ to be freely usable. :-P
You can complain about the "difficulty" of registering it and try to
use something else, or you could simply spend a few minutes registering.
You only have to do it once.
(Nevertheless, do you wonder anymore why so many developers prefer Linux?)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16/04/2012 01:05 PM, scott wrote:
> Personally (and I'm sure I'm not alone) I would happily have paid up to
Damn. You must have A LOT of money. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> You can complain about the "difficulty" of registering it and try to
> use something else, or you could simply spend a few minutes registering.
> You only have to do it once.
And by "once" I presume you mean "every single time you want to install
this program".
> (Nevertheless, do you wonder anymore why so many developers prefer Linux?)
Well, Visual Studio does work nicer than KDevelop; I'll say that for it.
But yeah, Unix was always intended to be a platform for software
developers and similar experts.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Personally (and I'm sure I'm not alone) I would happily have paid up to
>
> Damn. You must have A LOT of money. ;-)
No, I just used it a lot over the last few years...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |