On 05/04/2012 04:47 PM, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> On 4/5/2012 5:12 AM, Invisible wrote:
>> What makes you think it isn't POV-Ray?
>
> 1) You can tell just by looking.

Are you seriously saying "you can tell by the pixels"?

> 2) It's easy to find a list of the software they use, and POV-Ray isn't
> on it.

OK, that would be a valid reason.

Post a reply to this message

On 4/5/2012 8:49 AM, Invisible wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 04:47 PM, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>> On 4/5/2012 5:12 AM, Invisible wrote:
>>> What makes you think it isn't POV-Ray?
>>
>> 1) You can tell just by looking.
>
> Are you seriously saying "you can tell by the pixels"?
>

In the sense that making any such comment about a digital image or video 
amounts to "I can tell by the pixels", yes.

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:04:43 +0200, clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> Probably not made with POV-Ray, but still awesome:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyCIpKAIFyo

I followed the lead of the last comment and found the real thing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCIkbr9HCcw

Wow!

-- 
-Nekar Xenos-

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:49:14 +0100, Invisible wrote:

>>> What makes you think it isn't POV-Ray?
>>
>> 1) You can tell just by looking.
> 
> Are you seriously saying "you can tell by the pixels"?

It looks more like it was done in Blender's renderer to me.  There are 
characteristics in generation software that do tend to produce a certain 
kind of lighting characteristic or texturing characteristic that seem to 
be fairly consistent.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 05/04/2012 9:40 PM, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:04:43 +0200, clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>
>> Probably not made with POV-Ray, but still awesome:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyCIpKAIFyo
>
> I followed the lead of the last comment and found the real thing:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCIkbr9HCcw
>
> Wow!
>

Funny, I could not hear the sound of the pneumatics.
Oh! And do you think that Intel had anything to do with it?


-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 4/5/2012 1:40 PM, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:04:43 +0200, clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>
>> Probably not made with POV-Ray, but still awesome:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyCIpKAIFyo
>
> I followed the lead of the last comment and found the real thing:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCIkbr9HCcw
>
> Wow!
>

Totally awesome, thanks for tracking that down!

Post a reply to this message

Am 05.04.2012 14:12, schrieb Invisible:

> What makes you think it isn't POV-Ray?

Just a "gut feeling" from what they write on their website.

Post a reply to this message

On 4/3/2012 6:04, clipka wrote:
> Probably not made with POV-Ray, but still awesome:

I always thought it would be awesome fun to write the program that 
calculates those visuals. Sync the animation to the music and stuff like that.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."

Post a reply to this message

Nekar Xenos <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:04:43 +0200, clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> > Probably not made with POV-Ray, but still awesome:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyCIpKAIFyo

> I followed the lead of the last comment and found the real thing:

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCIkbr9HCcw

  Life imitates art?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

On 06/04/2012 03:30 AM, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/3/2012 6:04, clipka wrote:
>> Probably not made with POV-Ray, but still awesome:
>
> I always thought it would be awesome fun to write the program that
> calculates those visuals. Sync the animation to the music and stuff like
> that.

Not in realtime though. It needs to fire each ball a second or so 
/before/ the note sounds. ;-)

Post a reply to this message