![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
It's not just you. It's all of us (about to be) in the 40's.
Stick to books and you should do fine.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 08/03/2012 12:05 PM, Warp wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the average movie nowadays really boring?
No, not just you. And you are a bit late in noticing. :-P
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 08/03/2012 12:05, Warp wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the average movie nowadays really boring?
I thought it was just me...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 03/08/2012 12:58 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 12:05, Warp wrote:
>> Is it just me, or is the average movie nowadays really boring?
>
> I thought it was just me...
Nope ... I seem to prefer older movies as well. If you get a chance
watch some of those Clint Eastwood westerns. They are full of great
quotes, for example from The Outlaw Josie Wales ... Are you gonna pull
those pistols or whistle Dixie? ... classic!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 3/8/2012 4:05, Warp wrote:
> I think I'll just stick to big blockbusters, computer-animated movies
> and comedies. They seldom disappoint.
I can highly recommend Hugo. Just go see it. It's not about anything you
think it's about.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
People tell me I am the counter-example.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 09.03.2012 07:03, schrieb Darren New:
> On 3/8/2012 4:05, Warp wrote:
>> I think I'll just stick to big blockbusters, computer-animated movies
>> and comedies. They seldom disappoint.
>
> I can highly recommend Hugo. Just go see it. It's not about anything you
> think it's about.
I guess that falls into the "blockbuster" category. But yes - I guess
it's a must for anyone who likes movie pictures. Make sure to watch it
in a 3D theater.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 3/8/2012 10:03 PM, Darren New wrote:
> I can highly recommend Hugo. Just go see it. It's not about anything you
> think it's about.
This is one of those movies which I thought looked terrible from the
trailer, but actually ended up enjoying when I watched it.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 09.03.2012 07:03, schrieb Darren New:
> > On 3/8/2012 4:05, Warp wrote:
> >> I think I'll just stick to big blockbusters, computer-animated movies
> >> and comedies. They seldom disappoint.
> >
> > I can highly recommend Hugo. Just go see it. It's not about anything you
> > think it's about.
> I guess that falls into the "blockbuster" category. But yes - I guess
> it's a must for anyone who likes movie pictures. Make sure to watch it
> in a 3D theater.
Since I lack free will of my own, I did as commanded.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New escreveu:
> On 3/8/2012 4:05, Warp wrote:
>> I think I'll just stick to big blockbusters, computer-animated movies
>> and comedies. They seldom disappoint.
>
>
> I can highly recommend Hugo. Just go see it. It's not about anything
> you think it's about.
Another vote for it, can't go wrong on Scorcese. Even my daughter
enjoyed, despite being quite longer than the average movies she watches.
watch in 3D, it was made for it.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Em 09/03/2012 13:42, Warp escreveu:
> clipka<ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>> Am 09.03.2012 07:03, schrieb Darren New:
>>> On 3/8/2012 4:05, Warp wrote:
>>>> I think I'll just stick to big blockbusters, computer-animated movies
>>>> and comedies. They seldom disappoint.
>>>
>>> I can highly recommend Hugo. Just go see it. It's not about anything you
>>> think it's about.
>
>> I guess that falls into the "blockbuster" category. But yes - I guess
>> it's a must for anyone who likes movie pictures. Make sure to watch it
>> in a 3D theater.
>
> Since I lack free will of my own, I did as commanded.
so? boring or not?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |