 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The picture says it all.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ghost.png' (26 KB)
Preview of image 'ghost.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> The picture says it all.
Ghosts are not very clever.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17/11/2011 12:29 PM, nemesis wrote:
> Ghosts are not very clever.
Apparently. It finally finished at 157%, with -6 GB remaining. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/17/2011 4:56, Invisible wrote:
> On 17/11/2011 12:29 PM, nemesis wrote:
>
>> Ghosts are not very clever.
>
> Apparently. It finally finished at 157%, with -6 GB remaining. :-P
My first thought is you added stuff to the drive while it was ghosting, or
deleted stuff, or some such.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
People tell me I am the counter-example.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 18/11/2011 03:27 AM, Darren New wrote:
> My first thought is you added stuff to the drive while it was ghosting,
> or deleted stuff, or some such.
I deleted some stuff from the Ghost image, yes. But I also "compiled"
the result, which is supposed to flatten out the changes. (In other
words, you don't keep images of the blocks that are now unused, so the
file gets smaller.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
