 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 04.10.2011 21:18, schrieb andrel:
>> The only truly consistent ordering is the still uncommon ISO
>> year-month-date ordering ("2011-10-04"): Digits are listed in order of
>> descending significance (big-endian) throughout.
>
> correct me if I am but I seem to remember that this is japanese style.
Might be; I only know it's definitely ISO style.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> 1 Imperial beer barrel = 240 real pints = 288 US pints.
"This, my friend, is a pint."
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:24:10 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
>> 1 Imperial beer barrel = 240 real pints = 288 US pints.
>
> "This, my friend, is a pint."
"It comes in *pints*????"
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/10/2011 9:24 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
>> 1 Imperial beer barrel = 240 real pints = 288 US pints.
>
> "This, my friend, is a pint."
>
Thanks!
Slurp!
"This, my friend, is a dead pint."
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> The only truly consistent ordering is the still uncommon ISO
>> year-month-date ordering ("2011-10-04"): Digits are listed in order of
>> descending significance (big-endian) throughout.
>
> correct me if I am but I seem to remember that this is japanese style.
I thought they just called it "the year of the cat"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:54:09 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> The only truly consistent ordering is the still uncommon ISO
>>> year-month-date ordering ("2011-10-04"): Digits are listed in order of
>>> descending significance (big-endian) throughout.
>>
>> correct me if I am but I seem to remember that this is japanese style.
>
> I thought they just called it "the year of the cat"?
You're thinking of the Chinese calendar.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> correct me if I am but I seem to remember that this is japanese style.
>>
>> I thought they just called it "the year of the cat"?
>
> You're thinking of the Chinese calendar.
Oh, right...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/10/2011 3:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> > I thought they just called it "the year of the cat"?
> You're thinking of the Chinese calendar.
In the Century of the Anchovy.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5-10-2011 18:03, Stephen wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 3:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> > I thought they just called it "the year of the cat"?
>> You're thinking of the Chinese calendar.
>
> In the Century of the Anchovy.
Anyone knows what year this is and next will be. I though I saw it on
the calendar, but can't find it.
--
Apparently you can afford your own dictator for less than 10 cents per
citizen per day.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:39:42 +0200, andrel wrote:
> On 5-10-2011 18:03, Stephen wrote:
>> On 05/10/2011 3:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> > I thought they just called it "the year of the cat"?
>>> You're thinking of the Chinese calendar.
>>
>> In the Century of the Anchovy.
>
> Anyone knows what year this is and next will be. I though I saw it on
> the calendar, but can't find it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_calendar
Looks like this year is the rabbit, next is dragon.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
