"gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum." (Message 1 to 3 of 3)
From: Darren New
Subject: "gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum."
Date: 2 Sep 2011 00:22:37
Message: <4e605a0d$1@news.povray.org>
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/08/110831-dark-matter-proof-gravity-quantum-theory-cern-space-science/
Sorry. I just felt the need to say "gravitational polarization of the
quantum vacuum" a couple times. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
How come I never get only one kudo?
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/08/110831-dark-matter-proof-gravity-quantum-theory-cern-space-science/>> Sorry. I just felt the need to say "gravitational polarization of the> quantum vacuum" a couple times. :-)>
Of course you did. Quite understandable.
Interesting though.
Stephen
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: "gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum."
Date: 2 Sep 2011 06:56:06
Message: <4e60b646@news.povray.org>
On 02/09/2011 05:22 AM, Darren New wrote:
> Sorry. I just felt the need to say "gravitational polarization of the> quantum vacuum" a couple times. :-)
Try saying "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors".
(Fun fact: "monad" is in Thunderbird's dictionary, but "monoid" isn't.)