 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:42:14 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> I did think about that. But I'm guessing black is probably *the*
>>> hardest colour to dye something. Chances are I'll end up with dark
>>> grey rather than black...
>>
>> I'm sure a Google search could find you some information about how to
>> do it....
>
> It's not complicated; you buy some bye and you apply it. But I doubt
> anything you can buy in the shops matches the industrial-grade dyes they
> use when making black fabric professionally.
I'll bet a Google search would clear up your doubts.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 22/04/2011 10:50 AM, Stephen wrote:
>
>> To the happy farm ;-)
>>
>>
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=buy+black+shirt&hl=en&safe=off&sa=X&biw=1301&bih=641&tbm=shop&prmd=ivns
>>
>
> You had to include the "safe=off", didn't you? :-P
>
of your house. I mean, bed room...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> You had to include the "safe=off", didn't you? :-P
>>
> of your house. I mean, bed room...
The Elvis shirt is what I probably *should* wear. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/04/2011 14:53, Invisible wrote:
> OK, so check it out. For my dance competition next week, I want to wear
> a black short-sleeved shirt.
In fact, it turns out that what you wear apparently makes *no difference*.
A couple of my classmates were entered for an event, but due to an
injury they weren't going to do it. Five minutes before the event, they
changed their minds, and just walked on wearing whatever random clothes
they happened to have on. Didn't even have dance shoes. This apparently
made no difference to their scoring.
Worth it...
fancy costume for their kids. Or WTF the *adults* typically spend on
theirs!)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 03 May 2011 09:47:27 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> This apparently made no
> difference to their scoring.
It strikes me that it would be nearly impossible to assert this without
having them perform twice, once with the 'random clothes' and once with
their 'dance clothes'.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2011/05/07 22:59, Jim Henderson a écrit :
> On Tue, 03 May 2011 09:47:27 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>
>> This apparently made no
>> difference to their scoring.
>
> It strikes me that it would be nearly impossible to assert this without
> having them perform twice, once with the 'random clothes' and once with
> their 'dance clothes'.
>
> Jim
But then, you can't keep the same juges. Ther first impression will
affect the second notes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2011 14:07:32 -0400, Alain wrote:
> Le 2011/05/07 22:59, Jim Henderson a écrit :
>> On Tue, 03 May 2011 09:47:27 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>
>>> This apparently made no
>>> difference to their scoring.
>>
>> It strikes me that it would be nearly impossible to assert this without
>> having them perform twice, once with the 'random clothes' and once with
>> their 'dance clothes'.
>>
>> Jim
>
> But then, you can't keep the same juges. Ther first impression will
> affect the second notes.
True, unless they have no way of knowing who the performers are. Maybe
the performers need to wear masks.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
