 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
Caution: This may severely impact your spare time. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible escreveu:
> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
>
> Caution: This may severely impact your spare time. ;-)
ah, yes, oscillators and folks... but we already have so many great soft
synths out there...
Here's another time sink:
http://www.csounds.com/
or perhaps:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~music/nyquist/
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/09/2010 07:53 PM, nemesis wrote:
> ah, yes, oscillators and folks... but we already have so many great soft
> synths out there...
>
> http://www.csounds.com/
...and C-sound is not one of them. :-P
Besides, the link isn't about oscillators and filters, it's specifically
about how to use DSP to simulate real-world instruments and acoustic
effects. Kind of a "beyond the Kurplus-Strong algorithm" thing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9/23/2010 7:04 AM, Invisible wrote:
> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
>
> Caution: This may severely impact your spare time. ;-)
You know... I clicked that link... it coincided quite nicely with what I
was already looking at. Later switched to that tab and promptly wondered
which page led me to that, for the life of me I couldn't figure it out
.... Then I came back here this morning and there it is.
Yep. Bookmarked and will be my "light reading" for a while.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/09/2010 01:20 PM, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Yep. Bookmarked and will be my "light reading" for a while.
Heh. The scary part is, I kinda promised my girlfriend that I'd explain
this stuff to her over the weekend. ;-) And she seemed *interested* by
this idea.
On a scale of 1 to 100, that sounds pretty awesome, IMHO. We'll see if
she's still interested after 3 pages of elementary trigonometric
identities though! o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/09/2010 6:07 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> I kinda promised my girlfriend
Well get you! :-P
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I kinda promised my girlfriend
>
> Well get you! :-P
The key question, of course, is whether she'll still be my girlfriend
*after* the A-level math crash course... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/09/2010 7:12 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> I kinda promised my girlfriend
>>
>> Well get you! :-P
>
> The key question, of course, is whether she'll still be my girlfriend
> *after* the A-level math crash course... ;-)
>
The key question, of course, is whether you'll still be her boyfriend...
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
What I'm wondering is: Why must it be https? It's not like you are sending
any information, and encrypting the info the page is offering is kind of moot
(because it's available to anybody).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
>
> What I'm wondering is: Why must it be https?
Yeah, I was wondering about that too actually...
Maybe only the HTTPS port is open on the firewall or something?
Although, that would be pretty random...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
> >
> > What I'm wondering is: Why must it be https?
> Yeah, I was wondering about that too actually...
> Maybe only the HTTPS port is open on the firewall or something?
> Although, that would be pretty random...
The fact that the URL contains a username (which is what the tilde
signifies in the unix world) would be indicative that it's a regular
web server, rather than someone's personal computer (which might be
behind a ISP-enforced firewall which allows only ssh/https connections).
In the latter case you can still configure a regular http website,
in which case the address would have to be
http://ccrma.stanford.edu:443/~jos/wg.html (which is, of course, a bit
cumbersome). If the protocol is https: then the server *must* use the
SSL protocol (because that's what the protocol identifier is saying, and
thus the browser expects it), which is a burden to the server.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-9-2010 13:06, Warp wrote:
> Invisible<voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>> https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/wg.html
>>>
>>> What I'm wondering is: Why must it be https?
>
>> Yeah, I was wondering about that too actually...
>
>> Maybe only the HTTPS port is open on the firewall or something?
>> Although, that would be pretty random...
>
> The fact that the URL contains a username (which is what the tilde
> signifies in the unix world) would be indicative that it's a regular
> web server, rather than someone's personal computer (which might be
> behind a ISP-enforced firewall which allows only ssh/https connections).
The PC's that I use that run linux both have a general account in
/var/www/... *and* personal ones in the dir ~user/public_html so I would
think that a PC is very likely. In this case I tried the domain without
https and that immediately transfers to the https one.
Given who owns the domain I think it is a arbitrary decision by the
sysop, perhaps because he liked the rhythm or the sound better.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> which is a burden to the server.
Nowadays, it's actually a pretty tiny burden to the server. Something
like 3% overhead is what some google whitepaper I saw said.
And, arguably, if you encrypt *everything*, you're better off for privacy
than if you only encrypt the private stuff.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/09/2010 10:48 PM, Stephen wrote:
> The key question, of course, is whether you'll still be her boyfriend...
As it turns out... yes, I *am* still her boyfriend.
Last night, it was like this: http://xkcd.com/69/
Except instead of the Bellman-Ford algorithm, it was the Wave Equation.
And she seemed genuinely *interested*. O_O
My girlfriend is FRIGGING HARDCORE! XD I think I'm in love...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29/09/2010 10:12 AM, Invisible wrote:
> As it turns out... yes, I *am* still her boyfriend.
Nice one. :-D
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
