> But accidentally pressing the "reply all" can cause more than confusion 
> when you're bitching about someone. ;-)

True, but I wouldn't recommend bitching about people on corporate email 
anyway, you don't know who is reading it (regardless of who you addressed 
the email to).

Post a reply to this message

On 6-9-2010 16:17, scott wrote:
>> But accidentally pressing the "reply all" can cause more than
>> confusion when you're bitching about someone. ;-)
>
> True, but I wouldn't recommend bitching about people on corporate email
> anyway, you don't know who is reading it (regardless of who you
> addressed the email to).
>
>
I'd say on any e-mail not just corporate. Though if I say that some 
people might try to find proof that I did it in this newsgroup.

Post a reply to this message

On 06/09/2010 7:52 PM, andrel wrote:
> On 6-9-2010 16:17, scott wrote:
>>> But accidentally pressing the "reply all" can cause more than
>>> confusion when you're bitching about someone. ;-)
>>
>> True, but I wouldn't recommend bitching about people on corporate email
>> anyway, you don't know who is reading it (regardless of who you
>> addressed the email to).
>>
>>
> I'd say on any e-mail not just corporate. Though if I say that some
> people might try to find proof that I did it in this newsgroup.
>






-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 9/6/2010 1:23 AM, scott wrote:

> If you work on projects with teams of people it's invaluable, and pretty
> much the standard button to press to keep everyone informed of the
> ongoing discussion/actions/outcomes. It's very rare you only want a
> single person to see what you've got to say, it would actually cause a
> great deal of confusion later on.

Like I said... it definitely has its place. Its irritating when people 
abuse the feature though. Like when they send a reply that was directed 
only at the sender...

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message