 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ah, priorities. Life is all about them. For instance, right now I'm
sitting here reading people bickering about locating DLLs on Windows, or
about the purpose of autoconf, or how to implement bijective type
functions using type families... and it all seems oddly irrelevant to me
now. And that's mainly becuase last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
Yes, you read that correctly. Last night I gave myself to a beautiful
woman, AND SHE LOVED IT! :-D
Bet ya didn't see THAT one coming! :-P I know I didn't... ;-)
Best. Monday. Ever.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/08/2010 12:14 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Ah, priorities. Life is all about them. For instance, right now I'm
> sitting here reading people bickering about locating DLLs on Windows, or
> about the purpose of autoconf, or how to implement bijective type
> functions using type families... and it all seems oddly irrelevant to me
> now. And that's mainly becuase last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
>
> Yes, you read that correctly. Last night I gave myself to a beautiful
> woman, AND SHE LOVED IT! :-D
>
> Bet ya didn't see THAT one coming! :-P I know I didn't... ;-)
>
> Best. Monday. Ever.
>
You could have knocked me down with a feather.
I bet you can't stop smiling. :-D
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Bet ya didn't see THAT one coming! :-P I know I didn't... ;-)
>
> You could have knocked me down with a feather.
>
> I bet you can't stop smiling. :-D
Smiling, giggling, dancing.
Uh... maybe not dancing so much. Kinda sore, actually...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Uh... maybe not dancing so much. Kinda sore, actually...
TOO MUCH INFORMATION
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
woohoo! congrats!
well, there certainly was something odd about you these last days:
povray.off-topic was seriously silent... women have that kind of power... :D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 30.08.2010 13:14, schrieb Orchid XP v8:
> Yes, you read that correctly. Last night I gave myself to a beautiful
> woman, AND SHE LOVED IT! :-D
I hope you loved it, too :-P
Now which of the cuties & beauties is it? Did you mention her to us before?
> Bet ya didn't see THAT one coming! :-P
Well, how could we!
Then again, isn't that what we have always been telling you? :-P
Man, congrats. May it boost your ego a bit.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30-8-2010 13:14, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Ah, priorities. Life is all about them. For instance, right now I'm
> sitting here reading people bickering about locating DLLs on Windows, or
> about the purpose of autoconf, or how to implement bijective type
> functions using type families... and it all seems oddly irrelevant to me
> now. And that's mainly becuase last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
>
> Yes, you read that correctly. Last night I gave myself to a beautiful
> woman, AND SHE LOVED IT! :-D
>
> Bet ya didn't see THAT one coming! :-P I know I didn't... ;-)
>
> Best. Monday. Ever.
>
Congrats, but is this the sort of thing you want the world to know?
I see it is also on your blog, so the answer is apparently 'yes'.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
no replies from him yet?
damn, sounds like we lost our mascot...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
...do I get some kind of monetary compensation for still being in the
not-laid-yet club? <_<
...and I just moved to Iowa, so will probably never escape it.
orz
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> Uh... maybe not dancing so much. Kinda sore, actually...
>
> TOO MUCH INFORMATION
Apparently she's been walking funny all day too. ;-) (Unfortunately she
had to work yesterday.)
Gotta love a little TMI-bomb in the early afternoon, right? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yes, you read that correctly. Last night I gave myself to a beautiful
>> woman, AND SHE LOVED IT! :-D
>
> I hope you loved it, too :-P
A girl got totally naked and asked me to do her over. What do YOU
think?! :-P
> Now which of the cuties & beauties is it? Did you mention her to us before?
No, nobody you know.
>> Bet ya didn't see THAT one coming! :-P
>
> Well, how could we!
>
> Then again, isn't that what we have always been telling you? :-P
Heh. I went round to a friend's house for a cup of tea and a chat, and
somehow ended up staying the night in her bed. And not for the sleeping
part, either. (Actually, neither of us could sleep, even when we wanted
to...)
> Man, congrats. May it boost your ego a bit.
Hey baby, this is the new Andrew 2.0 edition here!
Andrew 1.0 was too scared to talk to girls. Andrew 2.0 managed to get
into a girl's pants WIHOUT EVEN MEANING TO! :-D
Still, this Andrew 2.0 stuff is kind of unexplored territory. It's
exciting, but kinda new and scary too. But I'm sure I'll manage. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> Congrats
Thanks.
> but is this the sort of thing you want the world to know?
Well... I'm not going to go into the pretty details of exactly what
happened. (Nor do I have any intension of sharing the subsequent events
which are likely to follow.) But I am feeling pretty pleased with myself
right now. I have a new spring in my step. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 31/08/2010 08:37, Tim Cook a écrit :
> ...do I get some kind of monetary compensation for still being in the
> not-laid-yet club? <_<
Yes, you get a non-pension for divorce, that's a big monetary advantage.
And it also includes, free of charge, the non-fund for children's
university.
You're such a rich person!
>
> ...and I just moved to Iowa, so will probably never escape it.
>
> orz
>
--
A good Manager will take you
through the forest, no mater what.
A Leader will take time to climb on a
Tree and say 'This is the wrong forest'.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> but is this the sort of thing you want the world to know?
Or, the sort of thing *she* wants the world to know?
> Well... I'm not going to go into the pretty details of exactly what
> happened.
I hate to imagine the content of the next "Random wanderings" post...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> but is this the sort of thing you want the world to know?
>
> Or, the sort of thing *she* wants the world to know?
Well *obviously* I asked her about that before posting my message. :-P
(I believe her exact words were "go for it!")
> I hate to imagine the content of the next "Random wanderings" post...
Hahahaha! OMG, I hadn't even thought about that...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Hey baby, this is the new Andrew 2.0 edition here!
I thought it was 3.2 edition... :p
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Ah, priorities. Life is all about them. For instance, right now I'm
> sitting here reading people bickering about locating DLLs on Windows, or
> about the purpose of autoconf, or how to implement bijective type
> functions using type families... and it all seems oddly irrelevant to me
> now. And that's mainly becuase last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
Heh. And now I've reading the draft of the new Standard Operating
Procedure on "Change Control for Computerized (sic) Systems with
Regulatory Impact". It has over 35 comments and edits on it, and as you
can imagine, it's quite rivoting stuff. Dry, beaurocrated procedural
details. I'm really having trouble concentrating here...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Gotta love a little TMI-bomb in the early afternoon, right? ;-)
The overshare light is on.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> I hate to imagine the content of the next "Random wanderings" post...
That's my LOL for the morning!
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Gotta love a little TMI-bomb in the early afternoon, right? ;-)
>
> The overshare light is on.
LOL! I gotta remember that one...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/31/2010 8:41 AM, Invisible wrote:
> Heh. And now I've reading the draft of the new Standard Operating
> Procedure on "Change Control for Computerized (sic) Systems with
> Regulatory Impact". It has over 35 comments and edits on it, and as you
> can imagine, it's quite rivoting stuff. Dry, beaurocrated procedural
> details. I'm really having trouble concentrating here...
It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
testing with you then.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/30/2010 6:14 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Best. Monday. Ever.
>
I was at a loss for words until now.
Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
> testing with you then.
Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> I was at a loss for words until now.
>
> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
Yes, that is correct my friend. >:-D
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/08/2010 7:25 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
>> testing with you then.
>
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
>
I don’t, I’m now helping to build submarines. :-P
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31-8-2010 20:25, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
>> testing with you then.
>
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
>
Me neither. I am combining all sorts of knowledge and techniques that I
like (physics, 3D programs, signal analysis, writing software, a bit of
reverse engineering fileformats, electronics...) and they even pay me
for that.
If only someone else would write the papers life would be perfect.
I assume having an interesting personal life could make up a bit for
dull work. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/08/2010 9:40 PM, andrel wrote:
> If only someone else would write the papers life would be perfect.
>
Did you have to remind me? :-(
> I assume having an interesting personal life could make up a bit for
> dull work. ;)
Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “may you live in
interesting times”? ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “
may you live in
> interesting times”? ;-)
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=585
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/08/2010 11:33 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “may you live in
>> interesting times”? ;-)
>
>
> http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=585
>
Interesting life and interesting times are two very different things. As
we both know. :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 8/30/2010 6:14 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>>
>> Best. Monday. Ever.
>>
>
> I was at a loss for words until now.
>
> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
Is that "Oh dear, God...."
or
"Oh, dear God."?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
> Is that "Oh dear, God...."
> or
> "Oh, dear God."?
I would suggest it's the latter.
Also: This is apparently why legal documents don't contain punctuation.
(Yes, I realise that makes no sense at all...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/31/2010 1:25 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
.
.
.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Also: This is apparently why legal documents don't contain punctuation.
> (Yes, I realise that makes no sense at all...)
Oh it makes perfect sense, so that the interpretation is open for debate,
which inevitably leads to a court case whereby more legal-types can make
even more money :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Also: This is apparently why legal documents don't contain punctuation.
>> (Yes, I realise that makes no sense at all...)
>
> Oh it makes perfect sense, so that the interpretation is open for
> debate, which inevitably leads to a court case whereby more legal-types
> can make even more money :-)
Or rather, it makes perfect sense in that if it's open to
interpretation, you can interpret it in whatever way is most beneficial
to you. :-/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Or rather, it makes perfect sense in that if it's open to
> interpretation, you can interpret it in whatever way is most beneficial
> to you. :-/
I don't know about the UK, but the rule in the USA is that if the contract
is ambiguous, it gets read in a way that goes against the person who wrote
the contract or brought the lawsuit. So, no.
Indeed, I've seen law cases where an extra comment separated two things the
author wanted bound together and cost millions of dollars.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
You lost most of your nerd points because of that. I suppose that makes
me the nerdiest person in this news server now.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
>
> You lost most of your nerd points because of that.
Oh, I am literally *so bothered*. ;-)
> I suppose that makes
> me the nerdiest person in this news server now.
I think you probably had that already...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> You lost most of your nerd points because of that.
The only reason he lost nerd points was because he put in a subject line of
Priorities
instead of a subject line of
Achievement unlocked!
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Oh, I am literally *so bothered*. ;-)
As an aside, you *did* call the young lady since then, right? Suggest
dinner somewhere nice, or a show, or something like that? :-) The
stereotypes about such things are fairly true, ya know.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > I suppose that makes
> > me the nerdiest person in this news server now.
> I think you probably had that already...
Maybe. You are way more social than I am.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> The only reason he lost nerd points was because he put in a subject line of
>
> Priorities
>
> instead of a subject line of
>
> Achievement unlocked!
Awesome! Early morning LOLs! :-D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Achievement unlocked!
Invisible unlocked achievement Sexual Intercourse. Invisible gains +5
charisma, +25 confidence, +6 experience and -8,192 nerd reputation.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 02/09/2010 10:13, Invisible a écrit :
> Darren New wrote:
>
>> Achievement unlocked!
>
> Invisible unlocked achievement Sexual Intercourse. Invisible gains +5
> charisma, +25 confidence, +6 experience and -8,192 nerd reputation.
You forgot the +(1D100-5) Happiness points.
--
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Benjamin Franklin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/09/2010 09:16 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 02/09/2010 10:13, Invisible a écrit :
>> Invisible unlocked achievement Sexual Intercourse. Invisible gains +5
>> charisma, +25 confidence, +6 experience and -8,192 nerd reputation.
>
> You forgot the +(1D100-5) Happiness points.
Good point!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/09/2010 05:06 PM, Darren New wrote:
> As an aside, you *did* call the young lady since then, right? Suggest
> dinner somewhere nice, or a show, or something like that? :-) The
> stereotypes about such things are fairly true, ya know.
Yeah, I'm still very much in contact. The girl likes her space, so I'm
giving her that. But yes, we will be meeting up again quite soon.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9/1/2010 10:36 AM, Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v8<voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> last night I GOT TOTALLY LAID!
>
> You lost most of your nerd points because of that. I suppose that makes
> me the nerdiest person in this news server now.
>
Woohoo! Go WARP!
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> I suppose that makes
>>> me the nerdiest person in this news server now.
>
>> I think you probably had that already...
>
> Maybe. You are way more social than I am.
Best compliment I've had for a while. (Other than the ones from girlie,
obviously...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> scott wrote:
>>> Uh... maybe not dancing so much. Kinda sore, actually...
>>
>> TOO MUCH INFORMATION
>
> Apparently she's been walking funny all day too. ;-)
That, too, is too much information.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >>> I suppose that makes
> >>> me the nerdiest person in this news server now.
> >
> >> I think you probably had that already...
> >
> > Maybe. You are way more social than I am.
>
> Best compliment I've had for a while. (Other than the ones from girlie,
> obviously...)
"oh, awe kid!"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/30/2010 7:14 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Yes, you read that correctly. Last night I gave myself to a beautiful
> woman, AND SHE LOVED IT! :-D
>
You poor bastard.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
