On 31/08/2010 7:25 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
>> testing with you then.
>
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
>



-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 31-8-2010 20:25, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
> 
>> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta 
>> testing with you then.
> 
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
> 
Me neither. I am combining all sorts of knowledge and techniques that I 
like (physics, 3D programs, signal analysis, writing software, a bit of 
reverse engineering fileformats, electronics...) and they even pay me 
for that.
If only someone else would write the papers life would be perfect.

I assume having an interesting personal life could make up a bit for 
dull work. ;)

Post a reply to this message

On 31/08/2010 9:40 PM, andrel wrote:
> If only someone else would write the papers life would be perfect.
>

Did you have to remind me? :-(

> I assume having an interesting personal life could make up a bit for
> dull work. ;)




-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “
may you live in 
> interesting times”? ;-)


http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=585

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
    Quoth the raven:
        Need S'Mores!

Post a reply to this message

On 31/08/2010 11:33 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “may you live in
>> interesting times”? ;-)
>
>
> http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=585
>

Interesting life and interesting times are two very different things. As 
we both know. :-)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 8/30/2010 6:14 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> 
>>
>> Best. Monday. Ever.
>>
> 
> I was at a loss for words until now.
> 
> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
Is that "Oh dear, God...."
or
"Oh, dear God."?

Post a reply to this message

>> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
> Is that "Oh dear, God...."
> or
> "Oh, dear God."?

I would suggest it's the latter.

Also: This is apparently why legal documents don't contain punctuation. 
(Yes, I realise that makes no sense at all...)

Post a reply to this message

On 8/31/2010 1:25 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:

> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.
.
.
.

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

> Also: This is apparently why legal documents don't contain punctuation.
> (Yes, I realise that makes no sense at all...)

Oh it makes perfect sense, so that the interpretation is open for debate, 
which inevitably leads to a court case whereby more legal-types can make 
even more money :-)

Post a reply to this message

>> Also: This is apparently why legal documents don't contain punctuation.
>> (Yes, I realise that makes no sense at all...)
> 
> Oh it makes perfect sense, so that the interpretation is open for 
> debate, which inevitably leads to a court case whereby more legal-types 
> can make even more money :-)

Or rather, it makes perfect sense in that if it's open to 
interpretation, you can interpret it in whatever way is most beneficial 
to you. :-/

Post a reply to this message