 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/31/2010 8:41 AM, Invisible wrote:
> Heh. And now I've reading the draft of the new Standard Operating
> Procedure on "Change Control for Computerized (sic) Systems with
> Regulatory Impact". It has over 35 comments and edits on it, and as you
> can imagine, it's quite rivoting stuff. Dry, beaurocrated procedural
> details. I'm really having trouble concentrating here...
It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
testing with you then.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/30/2010 6:14 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Best. Monday. Ever.
>
I was at a loss for words until now.
Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
> testing with you then.
Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> I was at a loss for words until now.
>
> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
Yes, that is correct my friend. >:-D
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/08/2010 7:25 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
>> testing with you then.
>
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
>
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31-8-2010 20:25, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> It seems v2.0 may have some regression errors. Oh well. Back to beta
>> testing with you then.
>
> Hey, most people have to do something dull to earn a living. ;-)
>
Me neither. I am combining all sorts of knowledge and techniques that I
like (physics, 3D programs, signal analysis, writing software, a bit of
reverse engineering fileformats, electronics...) and they even pay me
for that.
If only someone else would write the papers life would be perfect.
I assume having an interesting personal life could make up a bit for
dull work. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/08/2010 9:40 PM, andrel wrote:
> If only someone else would write the papers life would be perfect.
>
Did you have to remind me? :-(
> I assume having an interesting personal life could make up a bit for
> dull work. ;)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “
may you live in
> interesting times”? ;-)
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=585
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Quoth the raven:
Need S'Mores!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/08/2010 11:33 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Is that “interesting” as in the Chinese curse, “may you live in
>> interesting times”? ;-)
>
>
> http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=585
>
Interesting life and interesting times are two very different things. As
we both know. :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 8/30/2010 6:14 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>>
>> Best. Monday. Ever.
>>
>
> I was at a loss for words until now.
>
> Now I have words: Oh...dear...God...
Is that "Oh dear, God...."
or
"Oh, dear God."?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
