 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh my God... I just found this on the official website:
http://www.thebaseballs.com/videos/rocknroll
How *mental* is that?? It's, like, 3 minutes long and appears to be a
single take. Crazy!
I had no idea Poland was anywhere near this cool.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.08.2010 14:30, schrieb Orchid XP v8:
> I just received this from Amazon:
>
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Strike-Baseballs/dp/B003EEMG1U
Thanks for sharing - this is cool indeed.
Remotely reminds me of a band called "Big Daddy". They did some good
"retro-cover" music, too - though not strictly Rock&Roll, and it's been
a few years now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> http://www.thebaseballs.com/videos/rocknroll
Try this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zcOFN_VBVo
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> It's, like, 3 minutes long and appears to be a single take. Crazy!
Did you watch Children of Men? There's a scene that seems like 5 or 8
minutes long, all one take, of him running through a war zone, into a
building which gets blown up, back out again, etc etc etc.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Oh my God... I just found this on the official website:
>
> http://www.thebaseballs.com/videos/rocknroll
>
> How *mental* is that?? It's, like, 3 minutes long and appears to be a
> single take. Crazy!
>
It's a fun music video and all, but as far as technical achievement for
long single take videos this is not very impressive nor very novel (not
knocking the band, I'm sure they have a limited budget and aren't out to
make a technically impressive video anyway).
In the realm of music videos (of which I know very little) I think that
Ok Go's "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qybUFnY7Y8w is much more
impressive in this regard (and is inspired by equally or more impressive
previous work, such as that by Peter Fischli and David Weiss). There's
also several full-length movies which are essentially shot in a single
take, Rope (Hitchcock) and Russian Arc (Aleksandr Sokurov) both come to
mind. Multi-minute long takes in film actually aren't that uncommon.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
> Multi-minute long takes in film actually aren't that uncommon.
Actually taking into account the total amount of movies out there,
and the extremely small amount of multi-minute long takes, I'd say
it is pretty uncommon.
Some TV series also sometimes make some really long take, probably just
for the fun of it. For example, at the beginning of the Stargate episode
"Fallen" there's a rather complex uncut sequence of over 50 seconds (the
one that ends with "I hope it's not contagious").
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/08/2010 7:28 PM, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>
> It's a fun music video and all, but as far as technical achievement for
> long single take videos this is not very impressive nor very novel
If you are interested in single shot films then try Russian Ark. 96
minutes of St. Petersburg's State Hermitage Museum shot in one fluid
take using High Definition video cameras.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 7:28 PM, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>
>> It's a fun music video and all, but as far as technical achievement for
>> long single take videos this is not very impressive nor very novel
>
> If you are interested in single shot films then try Russian Ark. 96
> minutes of St. Petersburg's State Hermitage Museum shot in one fluid
> take using High Definition video cameras.
>
I actually mentioned Russian Arc in my post :), but yeah, it's really
impressive.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
>> Multi-minute long takes in film actually aren't that uncommon.
>
> Actually taking into account the total amount of movies out there,
> and the extremely small amount of multi-minute long takes, I'd say
> it is pretty uncommon.
Good point, I should probably have gone with a word like "rare" instead.
> Some TV series also sometimes make some really long take, probably just
> for the fun of it. For example, at the beginning of the Stargate episode
> "Fallen" there's a rather complex uncut sequence of over 50 seconds (the
> one that ends with "I hope it's not contagious").
>
I haven't really watched much of the Stargate TV series. How is it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/08/2010 9:10 PM, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> On 07/08/2010 7:28 PM, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>
>>> It's a fun music video and all, but as far as technical achievement for
>>> long single take videos this is not very impressive nor very novel
>>
>> If you are interested in single shot films then try Russian Ark. 96
>> minutes of St. Petersburg's State Hermitage Museum shot in one fluid
>> take using High Definition video cameras.
>>
>
> I actually mentioned Russian Arc in my post :), but yeah, it's really
> impressive.
Oops! So you did (-_-;;)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
