 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I must say, the UI to this set of programs really, really sucks.
I far prefer netpbm, where each program did one thing well, read stdin and
wrote stdout, and didn't reuse the same command-line arguments for a bunch
of different meanings and have all kinds of bizarre option-order conditions.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> I must say, the UI to this set of programs really, really sucks.
Patches welcome. :-)
Oh, wait - I didn't write imagemagick, did I?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
> I must say, the UI to this set of programs really, really sucks.
I know this is getting really old, but it's just too perfect to let pass:
If you are not happy with it, you can always demand your money back. ;)
Besides, it's open source, so if you want to fix it, go ahead. :P
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> I must say, the UI to this set of programs really, really sucks.
>
> I know this is getting really old, but it's just too perfect to let pass:
> If you are not happy with it, you can always demand your money back. ;)
What's the problem here? I can't talk about UI features of a free program
without getting crap? How the heck does any program improve if everybody
who doesn't like it just shuts the fuck up and goes away?
It's exactly this "we don't want to even discuss the possibility that our
program isn't perfect, because it's free and you're an ungrateful ass for
thinking a new user's perspective might be an interesting input to the
design process" that keeps me from contributing more to open source.
> Besides, it's open source, so if you want to fix it, go ahead. :P
It's not really a question of "fixing" it. It's the whole design philosophy.
I would have expected, for example, to use the "montage" program to tile
some images together rather than the "convert" program.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp escreveu:
> Besides, it's open source, so if you want to fix it, go ahead. :P
or fork it or ignore it if the original developers are not amused by
your changes. Checkout the latest Gnome vs Canonical flames...
well, at least this isn't a flame about ugly choice of colors, fonts,
lack of wizards or tabbed interface vs MDI or whatever GUI flames come
up... :P
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> >> I must say, the UI to this set of programs really, really sucks.
> >
> > I know this is getting really old, but it's just too perfect to let pass:
> > If you are not happy with it, you can always demand your money back. ;)
> What's the problem here? I can't talk about UI features of a free program
> without getting crap? How the heck does any program improve if everybody
> who doesn't like it just shuts the fuck up and goes away?
This must be a bizarro world.
When I don't use smilies, people complain that it's hard to understand
the tone in which I'm writing my replies.
When I *do* use the smilies, people get confused anyways.
The smiley was supposed to denote that I wrote my reply in jest.
Even though I'm not a big fan of using smilies (because I feel they are
akin to explaining the joke), I thought that in this case it would be
warranted. However, seemingly it didn't help.
So if smilies don't help clear up things, then what would?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> The smiley was supposed to denote that I wrote my reply in jest.
Sorry. It's probably just me. Work is being bonehead, and it's cheesing me
off a bit.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:08:55 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> I must say, the UI to this set of programs really, really sucks.
I would agree. I never use the GUI for the collection, and when using
the CLI, I always have to refer back to the docs for the program I'm
using. It's kinda a pain.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2010-08-03 14:16, Warp wrote:
> Even though I'm not a big fan of using smilies (because I feel they are
> akin to explaining the joke), I thought that in this case it would be
obligatory:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitle0t9r68ih?from=Main.DontExplainTheJoke
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On 2010-08-03 14:16, Warp wrote:
> > Even though I'm not a big fan of using smilies (because I feel they are
> > akin to explaining the joke), I thought that in this case it would be
>
> obligatory:
>
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitle0t9r68ih?from=Main.DontExplainTheJoke
two relevant quotes:
" 6. The joke is German, where a lot of jokes are explained in the end, for
some reason."
zat's for Warp and clipka... LOL
"Wikipedia is currently the world's largest collection of explained jokes."
I don't get it... LOL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
