 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnyFYs7x1zM
> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
Better than this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
>
> Better than this:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
Uh... why yes, yes it is. o_O
Perhaps the most worrying part is how into it everybody looks. (!)
Clearly I need to find some video of my school dancing. Then you will
know what actual dancing looks like. ;-)
(Incidentally, there *is* in fact a Rock & Roll move known as The
Chicken Walk. What you do is you... walk... like... a chicken.
Essentially, anyway.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:38:14 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnyFYs7x1zM
>
>> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
>
> Better than this:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
They're both better than this guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHn1n0JJiFc
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> 2. She has a very nice bottom. I'm loving that skirt too. Damn, pity
> there aren't any people like that in *my* dance class!
What are the people like in your class? :-O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> 2. She has a very nice bottom. I'm loving that skirt too. Damn, pity
>> there aren't any people like that in *my* dance class!
>
> What are the people like in your class? :-O
Which one? I'm in *several* classes. ;-)
I'm not very good with ages, but I'd say that most of the people in my
classes are in their 40s or older. (With several notable exceptions.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> I'm not very good with ages, but I'd say that most of the people in my
> classes are in their 40s or older. (With several notable exceptions.)
It's not like people in their 40's cannot have good... assets.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> It's not like people in their 40's cannot have good... assets.
Well put! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
>> Better than this:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
>
> They're both better than this guy:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHn1n0JJiFc
Actually... I didn't think he was *that* bad. At least he put commitment
into it. I've seen people dance propper dance steps and not make it look
that convincing. There's a lot to be said for energy and enthusiasm.
If you want to see *bad* dancing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umEShQ2SXK8
This is the first search result for "John Sargent". His name has become
synonymous with abysmal dancing. Dancing *so bad* that people were
actually voting to keep him in the competition _because_ he's so bad
it's amusing.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:07:05 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Actually... I didn't think he was *that* bad. At least he put commitment
> into it. I've seen people dance propper dance steps and not make it look
> that convincing. There's a lot to be said for energy and enthusiasm.
There's also a lot to be said for throwing yourself into it. And for
being concussed. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> If you want to see *bad* dancing:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umEShQ2SXK8
> This is the first search result for "John Sargent". His name has become
> synonymous with abysmal dancing. Dancing *so bad* that people were
> actually voting to keep him in the competition _because_ he's so bad
> it's amusing.
Hmm... Is that "bad" dancing because "he has next to no experience or
talent, and just doesn't know how to move", or is it "bad" dancing because
"his style of dancing (which he has clearly practiced) is too simplistic
and banal to be considered 'good' by any standard"?
I didn't see that performance as bad at all. Both had clearly practiced
that dance, and they seemed to perform the dance without visible errors
(at least to a completely unexperienced layman's eye). The *style* of the
dance was rather unique and simplistic, but is that "bad"?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
