On 10/07/2010 5:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:25:03 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> Move to a cooler clime. ;-)
>>>
>> I did, I came back home.
>
> Well, there you go. :-)

It doesn't feel like it today at 30° C

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 10/07/2010 5:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:25:03 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>> Move to a cooler clime. ;-)
>>>>
>>> I did, I came back home.
>>
>> Well, there you go. :-)
> 
> It doesn't feel like it today at 30° C

Aye, here it's been pretty miserable as well.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11/07/2010 7:04 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 10/07/2010 5:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:25:03 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Move to a cooler clime. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> I did, I came back home.
>>>
>>> Well, there you go. :-)
>>
>> It doesn't feel like it today at 30° C
>
> Aye, here it's been pretty miserable as well.
>

A bit cooler today, Max 25° C

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:38:23 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 11/07/2010 7:04 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/07/2010 5:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:25:03 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Move to a cooler clime. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I did, I came back home.
>>>>
>>>> Well, there you go. :-)
>>>
>>> It doesn't feel like it today at 30° C
>>
>> Aye, here it's been pretty miserable as well.
>>
>>
> A bit cooler today, Max 25° C

That's a good temp, actually where we're at right now. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11/07/2010 5:40 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:38:23 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 11/07/2010 7:04 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/07/2010 5:30 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:25:03 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Move to a cooler clime. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did, I came back home.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, there you go. :-)
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't feel like it today at 30° C
>>>
>>> Aye, here it's been pretty miserable as well.
>>>
>>>
>> A bit cooler today, Max 25° C
>
> That's a good temp, actually where we're at right now. :-)
>

:-D


-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> How do you do this in Haskell / Eiffel / any other languages that 
> perversely chose "--" as the comment marker?

  I wonder if that fact, and the fact that -- is the decrement operator
in C++, could be used to create a C++/Haskell polyglot.

  (Of course some people could argue that such a thing would be an
abomination and an affront to everything that is holy and just in this
world...)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

>   I wonder if that fact, and the fact that -- is the decrement operator
> in C++, could be used to create a C++/Haskell polyglot.

The other Fun Thing is that Haskell uses "{-" and "-}" as comment 
delimiters. (Although I guess those aren't valid fragments in C++.)

Ooo, and not forgetting that Haskell allows you to define "//", "/*" and 
"*/" as operator names. :-D

>   (Of course some people could argue that such a thing would be an
> abomination and an affront to everything that is holy and just in this
> world...)

Yes, actually.

Then again, I'm the kind of sick person who occasionally delights in 
such things... I guess I had a disturbed childhood or something.

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> How do you do this in Haskell / Eiffel / any other languages that
>> perversely chose "--" as the comment marker?
> 
>   I wonder if that fact, and the fact that -- is the decrement operator
> in C++, could be used to create a C++/Haskell polyglot.
> 
>   (Of course some people could argue that such a thing would be an
> abomination and an affront to everything that is holy and just in this
> world...)

http://mauke.ath.cx/stuff/poly.poly

Count the supported languages. I don't know if it's the most awesome thing 
in the world or just an abomination far greater than your idea.

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

> http://mauke.ath.cx/stuff/poly.poly
> 
> Count the supported languages. I don't know if it's the most awesome thing 
> in the world or just an abomination far greater than your idea.

Oh sweet! Literate Haskell... I hadn't even thought of that.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> http://mauke.ath.cx/stuff/poly.poly

> Count the supported languages. I don't know if it's the most awesome thing 
> in the world or just an abomination far greater than your idea.

  I counted these (some of which I'm just guessing):

- Whitespace
- zsh script
- bash script
- sh script
- Ruby
- Perl
- tcl
- Makefile
- C++ (with and without trigraphs)
- C89, C99 (with and without trigraphs)
- Haskell
- Brainfuck
- Python
- HTML (well, not really a programming language, but...)
- Javascript

  That's at least 15.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message