 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:47:24 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 10:50 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:14:37 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/07/2010 6:52 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> The water that goes to the upper floor is full of flouride and other
>>>> chemicals that give it an excess of anti-gravitrons, allowing it to
>>>> easily get up.
>>>
>>> LOL
>>
>> It's all a conspiracy, I tell ya... ;-)
>>
>>
> Mercy buckets, its true. :-)
LOL
>>>> The bigger question is why doesn't the tank fly off into space?;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The ball cock holds it down. All those chemicals stop it from lifting.
>>> ;-)
>>
>> Well, that would explain it. ;-)
>>
>>
> Some chemicals inhibit rising, whilst others actively promote it. O_o
So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Is water actually that damned heavy?
10 meters of water weighs as much as all the air over your head all the way
out to outer space. We've been to the moon. We can't manage to get down to
the base of the Gulf of Mexico.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> (The other fun thing is that if you swing it open, it hits the end and
> immediately bounces back in your face.)
That's broken. There's a spring that holds the clamp (for want of a better
word) against the bar with the notch in it. Sounds like that spring is screwed.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/07/2010 4:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Some chemicals inhibit rising, whilst others actively promote it. O_o
> So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense.;-)
>
So is just standing when you've taken chemicals. ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:00:18 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 08/07/2010 4:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Some chemicals inhibit rising, whilst others actively promote it. O_o
>> So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense.;-)
>>
>>
> So is just standing when you've taken chemicals. ;-)
I rediscovered that last night - Amy decided that it would be fun to make
martinis (we've never had them before). Quite a bit stronger than I
thought they'd be.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense.;-)
>
> So is just standing when you've taken chemicals. ;-)
No, surely just standing is *always*, by definition, a balancing act.
It's just that this act [and several others] becomes significantly
harder under the influence of certain chemicals. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/07/2010 6:02 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:00:18 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 08/07/2010 4:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Some chemicals inhibit rising, whilst others actively promote it. O_o
>>> So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense.;-)
>>>
>>>
>> So is just standing when you've taken chemicals. ;-)
>
> I rediscovered that last night - Amy decided that it would be fun to make
> martinis (we've never had them before). Quite a bit stronger than I
> thought they'd be.
>
The same with cocktails.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/07/2010 6:11 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense.;-)
>>
>> So is just standing when you've taken chemicals. ;-)
>
> No, surely just standing is *always*, by definition, a balancing act.
> It's just that this act [and several others] becomes significantly
> harder under the influence of certain chemicals. ;-)
>
Pedant! :-P
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:13:13 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 08/07/2010 6:02 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:00:18 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/07/2010 4:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> Some chemicals inhibit rising, whilst others actively promote it.
>>>>> O_o
>>>> So it's a balancing act, then? That makes sense.;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So is just standing when you've taken chemicals. ;-)
>>
>> I rediscovered that last night - Amy decided that it would be fun to
>> make martinis (we've never had them before). Quite a bit stronger than
>> I thought they'd be.
>>
>>
> The same with cocktails.
Yes, I've had some different cocktails that were quite strong. I think
we'll be making more different cocktails just to try things out. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/07/2010 6:20 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> Yes, I've had some different cocktails that were quite strong. I think
> we'll be making more different cocktails just to try things out. :-)
>
My favourite cocktail is a whisky one.
1 part whisky with 2 parts whisky, ice if you really need it ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
