 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Another point is I don’t want to be around in the latter part o
f the
> sun’s life cycle, never mind after the heat death of the univer
se.
I would expect that if any decent number of people got immortality, we'd
figure out how to get around that. It's a pretty common science fiction
theme, at least.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
C# - a language whose greatest drawback
is that its best implementation comes
from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/07/2010 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Might be time for a rewatch to get a good memory in place with it.:-)
>
Ni! Ni! '-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/07/2010 8:27 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Another point is I don’t want to be around in the latter part of the
>> sun’s life cycle, never mind after the heat death of the universe.
>
> I would expect that if any decent number of people got immortality, we'd
> figure out how to get around that. It's a pretty common science fiction
> theme, at least.
>
"INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER"
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:37:43 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Might be time for a rewatch to get a good memory in place with it.:-)
>>
> Ni! Ni! '-)
Agh, you said it! ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/07/2010 1:54 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:37:43 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/2010 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Might be time for a rewatch to get a good memory in place with it.:-)
>>>
>> Ni! Ni! '-)
>
> Agh, you said it! ;-)
>
:-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-7-2010 17:02, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> "Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Geesh... this is just spooky.
>> I especially like the last one. Here's another:
>>
>> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+beans+make+five
>
> OMG this is a fun game
> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=what%27s+up
but why did I expect another answer to
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=what%27s+up+doc ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7/4/2010 2:50 AM, Stephen wrote:
>
>
I hear there's this great restaurant ....
On a more serious note,
Yeah I've often pondered immortality. I think it would be a bad thing.
Now, if I could build up a retirement fund that would give me a
perpetually livable salary after, say, 65 years ... I'd be all for it.
But the prospect of having to do work that I don't want to do for
hundreds of years isn't all that exciting to me.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7/2/2010 7:24 AM, Invisible wrote:
> [insert witty remark here]
Your query returned no results...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> On a more serious note,
>
> Yeah I've often pondered immortality. I think it would be a bad thing.
You *think* it would be a bad idea?
Have you seen any population growth figures recently? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> [insert witty remark here]
>
> Your query returned no results...
Ah, well see, "bush" is also a slang word for... well, you fill in the
rest. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
