On 04/07/2010 2:37 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:47:34 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>

>> You are showing your age. :-P
>
> Perhaps, but he did that when I was how old?
>

I don’t know but the Ice Giants were still around. ;-)

I must give you credit though, for knowing your history. :-D


-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 08:53:50 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 04/07/2010 2:37 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:47:34 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You are showing your age. :-P
>>
>> Perhaps, but he did that when I was how old?
>>
>>
> I don’t know but the Ice Giants were still around. ;-)

Ah, but PBS over here runs a couple of his shows periodically, usually 
when they're raising funds. ;-)

> I must give you credit though, for knowing your history. :-D

LOL - I guess the mind still works. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 04/07/2010 6:08 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I don’t know but the Ice Giants were still around.;-)
> Ah, but PBS over here runs a couple of his shows periodically, usually
> when they're raising funds.;-)
>

Nice one!

>> >  I must give you credit though, for knowing your history.:-D
> LOL - I guess the mind still works.;-)
>

Not dead yet then ;-)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:17:39 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 04/07/2010 6:08 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> I don’t know but the Ice Giants were still around.;-)
>> Ah, but PBS over here runs a couple of his shows periodically, usually
>> when they're raising funds.;-)
>>
>>
> Nice one!
> 
>>> >  I must give you credit though, for knowing your history.:-D
>> LOL - I guess the mind still works.;-)
>>
>>
> Not dead yet then ;-)

Somehow that triggered a scene from Monty Python. (and I'm sure you know 
which one). ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 04/07/2010 7:24 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Not dead yet then;-)
> Somehow that triggered a scene from Monty Python. (and I'm sure you know
> which one).;-)
>

If it is the one I'm thinking of, the last time I heard it was at the 
start of a bad trip. Not mine but I spent the rest of the evening 
talking someone down. :-(

Ni! Ni!

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 19:56:29 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 04/07/2010 7:24 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Not dead yet then;-)
>> Somehow that triggered a scene from Monty Python. (and I'm sure you
>> know which one).;-)
>>
>>
> If it is the one I'm thinking of, the last time I heard it was at the
> start of a bad trip. Not mine but I spent the rest of the evening
> talking someone down. :-(
> 
> Ni! Ni!

Might be time for a rewatch to get a good memory in place with it. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> Another point is I don’t want to be around in the latter part o
f the 
> sun’s life cycle, never mind after the heat death of the univer
se.

I would expect that if any decent number of people got immortality, we'd 

figure out how to get around that.  It's a pretty common science fiction 

theme, at least.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
    C# - a language whose greatest drawback
    is that its best implementation comes
    from a company that doesn't hate Microsoft.

Post a reply to this message

On 04/07/2010 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Might be time for a rewatch to get a good memory in place with it.:-)
>
Ni! Ni! '-)


-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 04/07/2010 8:27 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Another point is I don’t want to be around in the latter part of the
>> sun’s life cycle, never mind after the heat death of the universe.
>
> I would expect that if any decent number of people got immortality, we'd
> figure out how to get around that. It's a pretty common science fiction
> theme, at least.
>

"INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER"

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:37:43 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 04/07/2010 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Might be time for a rewatch to get a good memory in place with it.:-)
>>
> Ni! Ni! '-)

Agh, you said it! ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message