 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> Generally with Youtube they resort to DMCA takedown notices for the US.
I thought they just generally scrubbed the audio out. (I.e., reencoded the
video with no audio track.) And with the DMCA takedown, youtube just takes
it down unless/until you argue they shouldn't.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Eiffel - The language that lets you specify exactly
that the code does what you think it does, even if
it doesn't do what you wanted.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> what could only be described as a full-body dry-heave on YouTube, either
> XD, besides, there are plenty of people out there that have already done
> that ...
LOL
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Eiffel - The language that lets you specify exactly
that the code does what you think it does, even if
it doesn't do what you wanted.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:07:14 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Generally with Youtube they resort to DMCA takedown notices for the US.
>
> I thought they just generally scrubbed the audio out. (I.e., reencoded
> the video with no audio track.) And with the DMCA takedown, youtube
> just takes it down unless/until you argue they shouldn't.
I don't think YouTube alters the video, it may be that users repost with
the audio scrubbed out.
But yes, with DMCA takedown they take it down, but they do have an appeal
process. The video is replaced by something that says it was taken down
and whom the request came from (there used to be a recording of Bill
Bailey's Remarkable Guide to the Orchestra up there, but it was taken
down due to a copyright assertion by Bill Bailey and there's a notice
that says so).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Generally with Youtube they resort to DMCA takedown notices for the US.
>> I thought they just generally scrubbed the audio out. (I.e., reencoded
>> the video with no audio track.) And with the DMCA takedown, youtube
>> just takes it down unless/until you argue they shouldn't.
>
> I don't think YouTube alters the video, it may be that users repost with
> the audio scrubbed out.
http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en-uk&answer=117597
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I mean, hell, you've *seen* me, right??
>
> I have ...
>
> But, you don't want to reach the high point of internet fame by doing
> what could only be described as a full-body dry-heave on YouTube, either
> XD, besides, there are plenty of people out there that have already done
> that ...
>
> Note: I don't know how well you dance, for all I know you could be the
> world's best dancer.. In that case, disregard my commentary ;)
Well, I've spent a year and a half at a *dance school*, and in a
fortnight I will be taking my first *dance exams*...
But it's what happened on Saturday night that I was hoping to recreate
parts of. I'll let you know when I've blogged it...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/06/2010 8:24 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Well, I've spent a year and a half at a *dance school*, and in a
> fortnight I will be taking my first *dance exams*...
Break a leg! :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Well, I've spent a year and a half at a *dance school*, and in a
>> fortnight I will be taking my first *dance exams*...
>
> Break a leg! :-)
Oh don't you start! This dancing lark is surprisingly dangerous. While
dancing, I made one lady's arm click in 3 seperate places. But that's
nothing; the other day I managed to ELBOW MY PARTNER IN THE ****ING
FACE! o_O And on Saturday night, somebody behind my put their stilletto
down my ankle...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> And the solution is/may be "fair use".
There's no such a thing from the point of view of the music industry.
When they threaten to sue you, or even send you a payment claim outright,
are you going to fight? I don't think so.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> When they threaten to sue you, or even send you a payment claim outright,
> are you going to fight? I don't think so.
You're only going to fight if you're *really* sure that it _is_ fair use...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/06/2010 8:32 PM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Well, I've spent a year and a half at a *dance school*, and in a
>>> fortnight I will be taking my first *dance exams*...
>>
>> Break a leg! :-)
>
> Oh don't you start! This dancing lark is surprisingly dangerous. While
> dancing, I made one lady's arm click in 3 seperate places. But that's
> nothing; the other day I managed to ELBOW MY PARTNER IN THE ****ING
> FACE! o_O And on Saturday night, somebody behind my put their stilletto
> down my ankle...
>
That is "Good Luck" in Thespian talk. And yes I ken dancing is dangerous.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
