 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Paul Fuller
Subject: Re: Fan without blades: should we ROTFL or weep?
Date: 7 Jun 2010 20:25:20
Message: <4c0d8df0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/06/2010 4:05 AM, Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>
> If you were scoping to see what was worth stealing, not a whole lot. ;-)
>
Drat. Not worth the airfare.
>
> Right, for the cheap knock offs. That way, when the liquid fries one of
> the motors, I am only out a few dollars.
A tank of propane may have some possibilities with one of these although
they probably are not powerful enough.
Once upon a time I worked as a sysprog for a bank. There was an
incident when water condensation built up in the air conditioning units
on Level 3. The outlet pipe had become blocked and water spilled over
the collection pan, found a crack in the slab, trickled into a light
fitting and collected until it broke the fitting and dumped out.
Estimated to be about 10 litres of water.
Then the real drama began. Level 2 was the main computer room. The
light fitting was the one sitting above the disk system housing amongst
other things the volumes for the mainframe running the production online
system. Water + Electronics = Failure.
Much mayhem ensued.
The link is that one of the IBM engineers had the idea to get some
industrial gas heaters in to help dry things out. These were large
blowers with gas burning in the air stream. Crank up the speed and
amount of gas and they were quite impressive. Somewhere less than a
rocket motor but still a *lot* better than a hand electric hair dryer.
Quite an interesting day. I had a spare system image on another disk
unit on the other side of the computer room. We got the system back up
in the evening and got through batch in time for the next day. The
affected unit was rebuilt. It needed some new controller boards but the
physical drives were fine. No data lost.
Good blokes those IBM engineers.
Not so good is the idea of putting the air con plant directly above the
computer room.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sabrina Kilian
Subject: Re: Fan without blades: should we ROTFL or weep?
Date: 7 Jun 2010 21:18:49
Message: <4c0d9a79$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 7:05 PM, Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>>>> Oh, I would and have. Just not pop-art.
>>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Examples please.
>>> >
>> I suppose the definition of 'cool' would be the trick. To me, hand made
>> jewelery is cool, even if it is just driveway gravel wrapped in plastic
>> electrical wire. Cheap old cameras are cool, more so if I can make them
>> work again. Bow-ties are cool...
>
> Good job I did not reply in High Dudgeon. ;-)
>
In the land of checkered planes and mirrored spheres, how could I not
like op-art?
Should have said pop-art and minimalism. I still wonder how a black
square on a white canvas was influential so long after the invention of
both black ink and white canvas. But that is an off-topic art rant.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Fan without blades: should we ROTFL or weep?
Date: 8 Jun 2010 16:04:55
Message: <4c0ea267@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/06/2010 2:18 AM, Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> Good job I did not reply in High Dudgeon. ;-)
>>
>
> In the land of checkered planes and mirrored spheres, how could I not
> like op-art?
>
your heart out.
> Should have said pop-art and minimalism. I still wonder how a black
> square on a white canvas was influential so long after the invention of
> both black ink and white canvas. But that is an off-topic art rant.
Some minimalism is OK (IMO) but I think it can be over done. (Is that an
oxymoron?)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '4spheresandaplane.jpg' (104 KB)
Preview of image '4spheresandaplane.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
