On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:54:57 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>> Could've used more sleep, but had two episodes of Clue to listen to
>> last night, and that helped.:-)
>>
>>
> It is hard to argue when you’re laughing :-)

Ain't that the truth.  We're into 1984 (our second listen through).  It's 
been interesting to listen a second time and pick up on things in the 
earlier shows that we missed the first time through because we weren't 
aware of them.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:16:20 +0200, andrel wrote:

> Comming back from a conference and subsequent stay in a monastery in
> Greece only to find a discussion on firefighters intelligence and UK vs
> US intelligence.
> Lets combine these two: any test that shows US persons are on average
> more intelligent than UK ones is inherently racist.

LOL

Post a reply to this message

On 04/06/2010 9:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:53:40 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> Well, yes, but it's accurate. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> And a tautology.
>
> Well, I can't argue that. ;-)
>

You are wrong!

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:08:16 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>>> And a tautology.
>>
>> Well, I can't argue that. ;-)
>>
>>
> You are wrong!

Well, yes, you're wrong, I *could* and *can* argue that, but I won't. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 04/06/2010 10:10 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:08:16 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> And a tautology.
>>>
>>> Well, I can't argue that. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> You are wrong!
>
> Well, yes, you're wrong, I *could* and *can* argue that, but I won't. ;-)
>


But you are
:-P
-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 04/06/2010 9:58 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:54:57 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> Could've used more sleep, but had two episodes of Clue to listen to
>>> last night, and that helped.:-)
>>>
>>>
>> It is hard to argue when you’re laughing :-)
>
> Ain't that the truth.  We're into 1984 (our second listen through).  It's
> been interesting to listen a second time and pick up on things in the
> earlier shows that we missed the first time through because we weren't
> aware of them.
>

I’ve just found a site that has some ISIHAC CD’s for download along with 
other interesting things. http://radioarchive.cc/index.php

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:34:08 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>>> You are wrong!
>>
>> Well, yes, you're wrong, I *could* and *can* argue that, but I won't.
>> ;-)
>>
> But you are
> :-P

No, I'm not, I'm arguing about whether or not I'm arguing about it.  
Biiiig difference. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> I’ve just found a site that has some ISIHAC CD’s for download along with
> other interesting things. http://radioarchive.cc/index.php

Yeah, that's where I found Navy Lark. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:34:08 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> You are wrong!
>>>
>>> Well, yes, you're wrong, I *could* and *can* argue that, but I won't.
>>> ;-)
>>>
>> But you are
>> :-P
>
> No, I'm not, I'm arguing about whether or not I'm arguing about it.
> Biiiig difference. ;-)
>

Well I’m arguing whether or not you’re just arguing and you are. :-)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> I’ve just found a site that has some ISIHAC CD’s for download along with
>> other interesting things. http://radioarchive.cc/index.php
>
> Yeah, that's where I found Navy Lark. :-)
>

And you didn't tell me about it. HUMPH!

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message