On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:16:19 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>> And I had my next move worked out, even. :-/
>>
>>
> Ah! Well. It just goes to show…
> 
> But after falling into a black hole and travelling halfway round the
> known universe then two and a half times round the multiverse, being
> turned inside out and back to front. Only to find I’m back where I
> started. You grudge me taking the shortest route?

I want to see an audit of the moves you made on that route. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 12/06/2010 6:39 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:16:19 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> And I had my next move worked out, even. :-/
>>>
>>>
>> Ah! Well. It just goes to show…
>>
>> But after falling into a black hole and travelling halfway round the
>> known universe then two and a half times round the multiverse, being
>> turned inside out and back to front. Only to find I’m back where I
>> started. You grudge me taking the shortest route?
>
> I want to see an audit of the moves you made on that route. ;-)
>

Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several lifetimes 
is enough. Brrrr!

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 12/06/2010 6:38 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
>> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>
> You may note that I *started* this thread.  ;-)
>

You self highjacker, you. :-)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:26:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several lifetimes
> is enough. Brrrr!

Oh, you don't have to live it again, just provide the points of 
reference. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:28:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 12/06/2010 6:38 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>>
>> You may note that I *started* this thread.  ;-)
>>
>>
> You self highjacker, you. :-)

I do that quite frequently. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 12/06/2010 8:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:26:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several lifetimes
>> is enough. Brrrr!
>
> Oh, you don't have to live it again, just provide the points of
> reference. ;-)
>

I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing 
the event horizon.
So believe it or not.


-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 12/06/2010 8:20 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:28:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/2010 6:38 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>>>
>>> You may note that I *started* this thread.  ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> You self highjacker, you. :-)
>
> I do that quite frequently. ;-)
>

:-D

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:32:58 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 12/06/2010 8:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:26:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several
>>> lifetimes is enough. Brrrr!
>>
>> Oh, you don't have to live it again, just provide the points of
>> reference. ;-)
>>
>>
> I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing
> the event horizon.

I guess we'll have to start work on stripping the event horizon so we can 
see how it was done. ;-)

> So believe it or not.

Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 13/06/2010 5:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:32:58 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>

>> I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing
>> the event horizon.
>
> I guess we'll have to start work on stripping the event horizon so we can
> see how it was done. ;-)
>

What do you mean *we*, Mathematician. ;-)

>> So believe it or not.
>
> Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)
>

Mornington Crescent

I also orbited a strange attractor :-P

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:12:44 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 13/06/2010 5:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:32:58 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing
>>> the event horizon.
>>
>> I guess we'll have to start work on stripping the event horizon so we
>> can see how it was done. ;-)
>>
> What do you mean *we*, Mathematician. ;-)

I'm no mathematician, but I did read an article about this last week. :-)

>>> So believe it or not.
>>
>> Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)
>>
> Mornington Crescent

You can't do that until the full moon.  From Earth. ;-)

> I also orbited a strange attractor :-P

That explains a lot. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 14/06/2010 2:57 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:12:44 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>

>> What do you mean *we*, Mathematician. ;-)
>
> I'm no mathematician, but I did read an article about this last week. :-)
>

That was the paraphrased punch line of, what is not a PC joke, Ke-mo 
sah-bee.


>>>> So believe it or not.
>>>
>>> Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)
>>>
>> Mornington Crescent
>
> You can't do that until the full moon.  From Earth. ;-)
>

Using the Brook-Taylor inversion that becomes a New Moon and due to the 
12th of June being Her Majesty the Queen’s official birthday the stars 
and Moon halt in their progress across the celestial sphere until the 
festivities are over. The move stands.

>> I also orbited a strange attractor :-P
>
> That explains a lot. ;-)
>

It does indeed.

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:28:15 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>>> What do you mean *we*, Mathematician. ;-)
>>
>> I'm no mathematician, but I did read an article about this last week.
>> :-)
>>
> That was the paraphrased punch line of, what is not a PC joke, Ke-mo
> sah-bee.

What makes you think I didn't catch it and was intentionally being 
obtuse? ;-)

>>>>> So believe it or not.
>>>>
>>>> Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)
>>>>
>>> Mornington Crescent
>>
>> You can't do that until the full moon.  From Earth. ;-)
>>
> Using the Brook-Taylor inversion that becomes a New Moon and due to the
> 12th of June being Her Majesty the Queen’s official birthday the stars
> and Moon halt in their progress across the celestial sphere until the
> festivities are over. The move stands.

Adjudication! ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 14/06/2010 4:01 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> What makes you think I didn't catch it and was intentionally being
> obtuse? ;-)
>

Your youth, the Lone Ranger TV programme ended in the late 50’s.


>> Using the Brook-Taylor inversion that becomes a New Moon and due to the
>> 12th of June being Her Majesty the Queen’s official birthday the stars
>> and Moon halt in their progress across the celestial sphere until the
>> festivities are over. The move stands.
>
> Adjudication! ;-)
>

OK.

You lost, :-P

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:55:21 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 14/06/2010 4:01 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>> What makes you think I didn't catch it and was intentionally being
>> obtuse? ;-)
>>
> Your youth, the Lone Ranger TV programme ended in the late 50’s.

Ah, but I do remember watching it.  Reruns, you know. ;-)

>>> Using the Brook-Taylor inversion that becomes a New Moon and due to
>>> the 12th of June being Her Majesty the Queen’s official birthday the
>>> stars and Moon halt in their progress across the celestial sphere
>>> until the festivities are over. The move stands.
>>
>> Adjudication! ;-)
>>
> OK.
> 
> You lost, :-P

:P

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 14/06/2010 6:29 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:

>>>
>> Your youth, the Lone Ranger TV programme ended in the late 50’s.
>
> Ah, but I do remember watching it.  Reruns, you know. ;-)
>

Ooo! Technology :-)


>>> Adjudication! ;-)
>>>
>> OK.
>>
>> You lost, :-P
>
> :P
>

:-D

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:27:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 14/06/2010 6:29 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> 
>>> Your youth, the Lone Ranger TV programme ended in the late 50’s.
>>
>> Ah, but I do remember watching it.  Reruns, you know. ;-)
>>
> Ooo! Technology :-)

Even back in the 70's. :-)

>>>> Adjudication! ;-)
>>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> You lost, :-P
>>
>> :P
>>
> :-D

Notting Hill Gate. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 14/06/2010 9:12 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:

>>> Ah, but I do remember watching it.  Reruns, you know. ;-)
>>>
>> Ooo! Technology :-)
>
> Even back in the 70's. :-)
>

If you say so.

>
> Notting Hill Gate. ;-)
>

But we've moved on to "Pick Up Song".

Wake up Jim :-P

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:34:35 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>> Notting Hill Gate. ;-)
>>
> But we've moved on to "Pick Up Song".
> 
> Wake up Jim :-P

*buzz* hesitation!  Oh, wait, I just buzzed myself.... ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 15/06/2010 4:31 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:34:35 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> Notting Hill Gate. ;-)
>>>
>> But we've moved on to "Pick Up Song".
>>
>> Wake up Jim :-P
>
> *buzz* hesitation!  Oh, wait, I just buzzed myself.... ;-)
>

LOL

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message