 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> That's got to be the most polite lurking I've ever seen ;-)
>
> Almost to the point of anti-lurking. ;-)
Well, wanted to announce that I'm back, but will read a little while
before I start actively engaging in debates and flame-wars again. ;-)
> Welcome back, Tim. :-)
It's nice to be back when a bunch of people remember you! :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Welcome back!
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:27:34 +0200, Tim Nikias wrote:
>>> That's got to be the most polite lurking I've ever seen ;-)
>>
>> Almost to the point of anti-lurking. ;-)
>
> Well, wanted to announce that I'm back, but will read a little while
> before I start actively engaging in debates and flame-wars again. ;-)
But of course. ;) One might debate, however, that you're actively
engaged in a debate now - namely, the debate about whether or not you're
actively engaged in a debate or not. ;-) (I couldn't resist. <G>)
>> Welcome back, Tim. :-)
>
> It's nice to be back when a bunch of people remember you! :-)
It's always good to see familiar people return. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:27:34 +0200, Tim Nikias wrote:
>
>>>> That's got to be the most polite lurking I've ever seen ;-)
>>> Almost to the point of anti-lurking. ;-)
>> Well, wanted to announce that I'm back, but will read a little while
>> before I start actively engaging in debates and flame-wars again. ;-)
>
> But of course. ;) One might debate, however, that you're actively
> engaged in a debate now - namely, the debate about whether or not you're
> actively engaged in a debate or not. ;-) (I couldn't resist. <G>)
Rabbit season!
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Ada - the programming language trying to avoid
you literally shooting yourself in the foot.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/06/2010 4:54 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:27:34 +0200, Tim Nikias wrote:
>>
>>>>> That's got to be the most polite lurking I've ever seen ;-)
>>>> Almost to the point of anti-lurking. ;-)
>>> Well, wanted to announce that I'm back, but will read a little while
>>> before I start actively engaging in debates and flame-wars again. ;-)
>>
>> But of course. ;) One might debate, however, that you're actively
>> engaged in a debate now - namely, the debate about whether or not
>> you're actively engaged in a debate or not. ;-) (I couldn't resist. <G>)
>
> Rabbit season!
>
>
In the UK it is sunbathing season :-D
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:18:29 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> In the UK it is sunbathing season :-D
Do we really want to see you in a swimsuit, Stephen? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/06/2010 5:46 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:18:29 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> In the UK it is sunbathing season :-D
>
> Do we really want to see you in a swimsuit, Stephen? ;-)
>
I promise it won’t be a bikini.
Altho' I think that I'd suit an "Athletic Tank Suit"
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:02:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 03/06/2010 5:46 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:18:29 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> In the UK it is sunbathing season :-D
>>
>> Do we really want to see you in a swimsuit, Stephen? ;-)
>>
>>
> I promise it won’t be a bikini.
Now I'm just getting ready for lunch...I don't *think* I needed that
image in my head. ;-)
> Altho' I think that I'd suit an "Athletic Tank Suit"
LOL
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/06/2010 6:21 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Do we really want to see you in a swimsuit, Stephen?;-)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> > I promise it won’t be a bikini.
> Now I'm just getting ready for lunch...I don't*think* I needed that
> image in my head.;-)
>
I’ll have you know that in my youth I was considered a beauty and was
asked out by several guys. (This is a long story and I don’t think I
have the time for it just now.)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> But of course. ;) One might debate, however, that you're actively
> engaged in a debate now - namely, the debate about whether or not you're
> actively engaged in a debate or not. ;-) (I couldn't resist. <G>)
Oh you did NOT just invoke the Liar Paradox...! >:-[
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
