 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> And they take it down. Huh? Me no comprende. Are they nuts?
Samsung doesn't have the rights to it. They probably bought the rights to
broadcast it X times on Y television stations.
Kind of like how you don't have the copyright to your wedding photos.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Yes, we're traveling together,
but to different destinations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:12:40 -0400, Kyle wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO9U71dsp0U
>>
>> Ah, now that one works. :-)
>>
>>
> "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Samsung
> Electronics."
>
> Not any more. :-(
Sheesh, you'd think they'd WANT their advertising out there.
It's like the Russians in Dr. Strangelove - who had a doomsday device to
act as a deterrent, but hadn't announced that they had it to the world,
but had turned it on...
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:29:51 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>> And they take it down. Huh? Me no comprende. Are they nuts?
>
> Samsung doesn't have the rights to it. They probably bought the rights
> to broadcast it X times on Y television stations.
>
> Kind of like how you don't have the copyright to your wedding photos.
If that was the case, wouldn't the copyright claim be from someone else?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> If that was the case, wouldn't the copyright claim be from someone else?
It probably *should*, technically. Maybe Samsung is making the claim on
behalf of an advertising company or something.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Yes, we're traveling together,
but to different destinations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:25:15 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> If that was the case, wouldn't the copyright claim be from someone
>> else?
>
> It probably *should*, technically. Maybe Samsung is making the claim on
> behalf of an advertising company or something.
I suppose that's possible....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
