 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saw this video last night on G4 about the iPad, made me laugh...
http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow/exclusives/70387/Distended-Warrantys-iHate-Therefore-iPad-Music-Video.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"somebody" <x### [at] y com> wrote:
> I don't think the elderly fall into the apple fanboy demographics. Apple's
> target audience is pretty much fixed, independent of the product they put
> out. It could be a hearing aid or a diaper, and you'd still get the same
> group of late 20s early 30s yuppies flocking to it.
Hilarious! I'm still laughing, because it's all *so* true. (Although, I admit
that Apple's *systems*, whatever they are, are always far easier to use than an
equivalent Windows thing--if there even *is* an equivalent. And less glitchy.
Mainly, I guess, because Apple always keeps the thing as a complete *closed*
proprietary system--with more control over A-to-Z. So even 'the elderly'
probably have an easier time with it, whatever it is.)
With today's ever-increasingly-complex home computer technology, and a resulting
inability to understand it all, the lower age limit of 'those who are completely
lost and clueless' might be getting lower and lower. Soon, only kids will truly
understand what's going on!
There's an old phrase, "That kid is lucky; he was born with a silver spoon in
his mouth." Meaning, rich kids have an easier time in life. But perhaps that
needs changing in the present environment: replace 'silver spoon' with 'USB
memory stick.' The ability to easily grasp technological change seems far more
important now.
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
somebody <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
> Apple's target audience is pretty much fixed, independent of the product
> they put out.
Not true. The vast majority of iPod and iPhone users don't own any other
Apple products nor could care less about them.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> No USB port? No multi-tasking?
>
> Is it me, or is this thing just an over-sized iPod?
But hey, it blends!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAl28d6tbko
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> No multi-tasking?
Curiously, the next OS upgrade will support multitasking.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
>
> Curiously, the next OS upgrade will support multitasking.
>
That's one of the advantages that the Droid has now over the iPhone.
I'll be happy when they add it. If they add turn-by-turn directions to
Google maps too, another feature of the Droid, I'll be extra happy!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kyle wrote:
> That's one of the advantages that the Droid has now over the iPhone.
I saw an interesting article about this. Phones generally don't do that
sort of multitasking because you don't have any swap space, so if your app
is written "knowing" how much RAM a phone has, it'll generally not get along
well with others. Droid has a system call that says "I'm nuking you -
package up what you need to recover your state." So something like
navigation would just package up the destination and options, and would
throw away the tiles and the path data, until you popped it back up to the
front, whereupon it would re-download the map and recalculate the path.
I'm not sure how Apple is going to make the multitasking work with legacy
apps that don't implement something liek that.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Yes, we're traveling together,
but to different destinations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> I'm not sure how Apple is going to make the multitasking work with legacy
> apps that don't implement something liek that.
I don't know either (yet), but it's possible that the multitasking will
work only with apps with specific support. (I'm guessing that it would be
in the realm of possibility that you could run *one* legacy app which
doesn't have multitasking support alongside several which do, which would
also be helpful because you could run the iPhone's own system apps in the
background while playing a legacy game or whatever. But as I said, I know
next to nothing about that at this point, so I'm just guessing.)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> I'm not sure how Apple is going to make the multitasking work with
> legacy apps that don't implement something liek that.
>
I just checked with my sister who writes iPhone apps, and she doesn't
know yet either. LOL. She's planning to learn the new OS and SDK over
the next couple of weeks. It's still all in beta at this point anyway.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
