|
|
I just read a PhD thesis where somebody wrote an LLVM back-end for the
Haskell compiler. The "conclusions" section is entertaining. Consider this:
current complete uselessness is surprising. In closing, I believe that
LLVM offers a compelling and viable back-end target for GHC today."
Obviously I'm taking this out of context. But seriously... it's useless,
and that makes it a compelling and viable back-end? I LOL'd.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
On 03/05/10 06:06, Invisible wrote:
> I just read a PhD thesis where somebody wrote an LLVM back-end for the
> Haskell compiler. The "conclusions" section is entertaining. Consider this:
>
> current complete uselessness is surprising. In closing, I believe that
> LLVM offers a compelling and viable back-end target for GHC today."
>
> Obviously I'm taking this out of context. But seriously... it's useless,
> and that makes it a compelling and viable back-end? I LOL'd.
Ponder over how useful Haskell is, and you'll have your answer.<G>
--
How many of you believe in telekinesis? Raise MY hand!
Post a reply to this message
|
|